Answer:
According to my very precise calculations, I've come to the conclusion that the answer is 1.
Answer:
The answer is A
Step-by-step explanation:
A because it's simply adding by 4 on the right-hand side.
1. 8
2. 15
3. 2
4. 1/2
5. 3
those are the answers in order, hope this helps!
Answer:
b. We have very strong evidence that the long-run average guess of the population size of Milwaukee, Wisconsin is smaller with the anchor of Green Bay than with the anchor of Chicago.
Step-by-step explanation:
Smaller p-value indicates a strong evidence in favor of the alternative hypothesis which means we can reject the null hypothesis. In the given scenario the p-value is 0.0001 which is very small. There is sufficient evidence for the rejection of null hypothesis.
Answer:
First three terms of given sequence are
9, 13, 17
Step-by-step explanation:
