I believe it is "Because I don't drive." The person writing the sentence never started it off properly.
I don’t have a very detailed explanation, however the answer should be “A 90-degree counterclockwise rotation about the origin followed by a translation 1 unit to the left”.
You can clearly see a 90° angle here, it’s obvious. Also, the polygon switch counterclockwise. so, you can see.
hope I helped ^^
Divide by 21 to put the equation in intercept form.
x/(21/9) + y/(-21/7) = 1
x/(7/3) + y/(-3) = 1
The x-intercept is (7/3, 0)
The y-intercept is (0, -3)
The 3rd choice is appropriate.
The asymptotes are where the graph is undefined. Since: tan(x) =sin(x)/cos(x)
It is where cos(4x-π) = 0
cos(4x-π) = 0 when the inside is -π/2 , π/2 , 3π/2
4x - π = π/2
4x = π/2 + π
4x = 3π/2
x = 3π/8
4x - π = 3π/2
4x = 3π/2 + π
4x = 5π/2
x = 5π/8
This ones outside the interval (5π/8 > π/2) , try -π/2
4x - π = -π/2
4x = -π/2 + π
4x = π/2
x = π/8
Asymptotes are π/8 and 3π/8
The two highlighted rows show that for the same amount of blue, Purple #1 uses <u>more</u> red than Purple #2.
This means that Purple #1 is <u>a redder</u> shade of purple than Purple #2.
Purple #2 is <u>a bluer</u> shade of purple than Purple #1.
Step-by-step explanation:
The two highlighted rows show that for the same amount of blue, Purple #1 uses <u>more</u> red than Purple #2.
- Making blue's quantity as 3 parts for purple #1 implies red part becomes 1.5 to maintain the ratio 1:2
- Purple #1 has 1/3 parts red and 2/3 parts blue. Purple #2 has 1/4th part red and 3/4th part blue.
- Hence, Purple #1 is <u>a redder</u> shade of purple than Purple #2.
- From the above explanation, Purple #2 is <u>a bluer</u> shade of purple than Purple #1.
