Let the null hypothesis be that the agent's claim is correct. Using a standard normal probability table we find:
The p-value 0.14 is much larger than alpha = 0.01, so we cannot reject the agent's claim.
Answer: If a number is rational, it can be represented as a simple fraction, it can be written as a terminating decimal, and a repeating decimal.
If a number is irrational, it cannot be represented as a simple fraction, it cannot be written as a terminating decimal, and not as a repeating decimal. It never ends, never repeats, just like the constant pi.
Step-by-step explanation:
So if a number is rational, it can be represented as a simple fraction, it can be written as a terminating decimal, and a repeating decimal.
If a number is irrational, it cannot be represented as a simple fraction, it cannot be written as a terminating decimal, and not as a repeating decimal. It never ends, never repeats, just like the constant pi.
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
the expression we have is:
To find an equivalent expression, it would be helpful to express 1/3 so that it has a 12 in the denominator:
so we substitute this:
and now we have 1/12 in both terms :
so we can factor it (we take it out of each term: in the first we are left with -x and in the second with -4):
the equivalent expression is:
I think in the first sentence, that should have been 3/4 instead of 34. Total amount of steak bought (lb)
total amount = (3/4 lb/steak)(12 steak) = 9 lb
To find the total amount that Silvia spends for each pound of steak, we divide $90 by 9 and that will give us an answer of $10.
-9(3-r)=45
-27+9t=45
9r=45+27
R=72/9
R=8
The answer is 8 not -8
