Which relation is not a function?<br><br><br><br><br> Helppppo due now

What is the value of x if x/ 3 + 1 = -2 ?

Serga [27]

<h2>Answer:</h2><h3>x = -9</h3>

<h2>Step-by-step explanation:</h2>

<h3><u>Step 1</u>: Simplify both sides of the equation.</h3><h3 /><h3>1/3x+1=−2</h3><h3 /><h3><u>Step 2</u>: Subtract 1 from both sides.</h3><h3 /><h3>1/3x+1−1=−2−1</h3><h3 /><h3>1/3x=−3</h3><h3 /><h3><u>Step 3</u>: Multiply both sides by 3.</h3><h3 /><h3>3*(1/3x)=(3)*(−3)</h3><h3 /><h3>x=−9</h3>

8 0

3 years ago

Find the value of x in 4:x::x:16

AnnyKZ [126]

Given:

4:x::x:16

To find:

The value of x.

Solution:

We have,

4:x::x:16

It means, we have

4:x = x:16

It can be rewritten as

$\dfrac{4}{x}=\dfrac{x}{16}$

On cross multiplication, we get

$4\times 16=x\times x$

$64=x^2$

Taking square root on both sides.

$\pm \sqrt{64}=x$

$\pm 8=x$

Since ratio can be negative or positive, therefore, the value of x is either -8 or 8.

4 0

3 years ago

A local police chief claims that 31% of all drug-related arrests are never prosecuted. A sample of 500 arrests shows that 27% of

Elis [28]

Answer:

$z=\frac{0.27 -0.31}{\sqrt{\frac{0.31(1-0.31)}{500}}}=-1.933$

$p_v =P(Z$

If we compare the p value obtained and the significance level given $\alpha=0.02$ we have $p_v>\alpha$ so we can conclude that we have enough evidence to FAIL reject the null hypothesis, and we can said that at 2% of significance the proportion of arrests that were not prosecuted is not significanlty less than 0.31.

Step-by-step explanation:

1) Data given and notation

n=500 represent the random sample taken

X represent the number of arrests that were not prosecuted.

$\hat p=0.27$ estimated proportion of arrests that were not prosecuted

$p_o=0.31$ is the value that we want to test

$\alpha=0.02$ represent the significance level

Confidence=98% or 0.98

z would represent the statistic (variable of interest)

$p_v$ represent the p value (variable of interest)

2) Concepts and formulas to use

We need to conduct a hypothesis in order to test the claim that the true proportion is less than 0.31.:

Null hypothesis: $p\geq 0.31$

Alternative hypothesis: $p < 0.31$

When we conduct a proportion test we need to use the z statisitc, and the is given by:

$z=\frac{\hat p -p_o}{\sqrt{\frac{p_o (1-p_o)}{n}}}$ (1)

The One-Sample Proportion Test is used to assess whether a population proportion $\hat p$ is significantly different from a hypothesized value $p_o$ .

3) Calculate the statistic

Since we have all the info requires we can replace in formula (1) like this:

$z=\frac{0.27 -0.31}{\sqrt{\frac{0.31(1-0.31)}{500}}}=-1.933$

4) Statistical decision

It's important to refresh the p value method or p value approach . "This method is about determining "likely" or "unlikely" by determining the probability assuming the null hypothesis were true of observing a more extreme test statistic in the direction of the alternative hypothesis than the one observed". Or in other words is just a method to have an statistical decision to fail to reject or reject the null hypothesis.

The significance level provided $\alpha=0.02$ . The next step would be calculate the p value for this test.

Since is a left tailed test the p value would be:

$p_v =P(Z$

If we compare the p value obtained and the significance level given $\alpha=0.02$ we have $p_v>\alpha$ so we can conclude that we have enough evidence to FAIL reject the null hypothesis, and we can said that at 2% of significance the proportion of arrests that were not prosecuted is not significanlty less than 0.31.

3 0

3 years ago

Solve the following system of linear equation by graphing. <br>4x + 2y = -2 <br>2x – 3y = 9

Viefleur [7K]

If you can graph in slope intercept, your new equations would be: y= -2x-1 and y= 2/3x-3.
Just graph those now since it should be easier.

3 0

3 years ago

What is the determinant of <br><br>15<br><br>18<br><br>154

IgorC [24]

Answer:

The determinant is 15.

Step-by-step explanation: