Explanation:
The Journal Entry from July 1 and July 31 is shown below:-
1. Cash Dr, $560
To Deferred revenue $560
(Being cash is received)
2. Deferred revenue $336
To Sales revenue $336
(Being 12 months sales service is recorded)
3. Cost of goods sold $280
To Inventory $280
(Being cost of goods sold is recorded)
4. Deferred revenue ($336 ÷ 12) $28
To Service revenue $28
(Being Deferred service revenue is recorded)
Working Note:-
Cellular service revenue = offer price ÷ total cost of phone and service × cellular service
= (($560 ÷ ($448 + $672)) × $672
= $336
Answer:
B. Strategic alliance
Explanation:
Strategic alliance is the agreement between two or more players (companies) to share resources or knowledge in such a way that it benefits all parties involved.
It is an agreement for cooperation among two or more independent firms to work together to achieve a common goal which is usually profit making. The example asked in the question is a form of strategic outsourcing relationship where the Soccer to the masses shared their products with the Japanese company in exchange for the Japanese company offering manufacturing and wilder distribution of the products.
All parties involved hopes for a synergy where everyone benefits more from the alliance rather than if they stood alone.
Answer:
Throughout the clarification section below the overview according to the situation given is summarized.
Explanation:
- Those who understand the argument that it would be very crucial for healthcare institutions to find an appropriate equilibrium regarding cost savings in terms of treatment versus the outcome of education, although medical professionals could only be able to continue giving help regarding health so many of the community fairly if they can accomplish the goal of economic feasibility alone.
- Cost productivity, as well as the level of the product, have such a negative correlation with something which means that the expenditure would naturally decrease with either the improvement in the standard of treatment, consequently allowing the industry premium and yet at the same moment successful in performance.
However, in the forthcoming development, insurance reveals greater interest about what kinds of expenditures or improvements are somewhat more successful in improving and encouraging the level of efficiency of healthcare organizations or what kinds of interventions as well as expenditures resulting throughout the bottom of the distribution or diversion.
Answer: The Non Compete is NOT Enforceable.
Explanation:
An Agreement not to compete with your previous company is a RESTRICTIVE covenant that was generally introduced to ensure that Upper and Middle Management who were generally privy to Trade Secrets in an Organization do not take that information somewhere else and use it against that old company usually in exchange for better compensation packages.
Hernandez joined Access Organics and regrettably was not given a pay increase or any other special considerations. This is very relevant.
For a Non-compete to hold relevance especially if it is signed AFTER an employee has already being working in an organization, there needs to be SUFFICIENT Considerations that gave the employee better terms such as more job security or better benefits as a result of signing said agreement.
Andy Hernandez received no such benefits in return for signing the agreement and so the Non-compete Agreement lacks said Sufficient Considerations.
The Non-compete is therefore NOT ENFORCEABLE.
It is worthy of note that in the actual case, the Judge ruled in favor of of Andy Hernandez.
If you require further clarification do react or comment.
