Motion is

Physics

1 answer:

Sladkaya [172]3 years ago

7 0

Answer:

a change of position in relation to another object.

Explanation:

Motion can be defined as a change in the location (position) of a physical object or body with respect to a reference point.

This ultimately implies that, motion would occur as a result of a change in location (position) of an object with respect to a reference point or frame of reference i.e where it was standing before the effect of an external force.

A reference point refers to a location or physical object from which the motion (movement) of another physical object or body can be determined.

Mathematically, the motion of an object is described in terms of acceleration, time, distance, speed, velocity, displacement, position, etc.

Hence, motion is a change of position in relation to another object.

You might be interested in

According to Newton's Ist law, what will an object in motion tend to do?

SCORPION-xisa [38]

Answer:

According to Newton's first law of motion:

An object in motion tends to remain in motion unless an external force acts upon it.

It stays in motion with the same speed and goes in the same direction.

Hope this helped

:)

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Help plzzzzzzz i need thissssssssss

frutty [35]

Answer:

The final graph

Explanation:

The graph that curves downwards is negative acceleration. While the position decreases the slop increases.

8 0

3 years ago

Which topic are you most likely to find in a physics textbook?

Darina [25.2K]

I think the answer would be physics.

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Which is equal to 4 hectometers?

liberstina [14]

B: 0.4 kilometers ...

5 0

3 years ago

In general, court in the United States have repeatedly struck down efforts to include creationism or intelligent design in publi

OverLord2011 [107]

Because they are not supported by the results of any legitimate investigation
that's conducted in accordance with the Scientific Method.

You may say:
"Well then, teach both lines of reasoning,
and let each student decide for himself."

This is suggested by the same people who aren't ready to let their
fourth-grader choose his own clothing, dinner menu, or school.
And it sounds reasonable to a vast mass of citizens who have decided
for them selves that the jury is still out on climate change.

What I'm saying is this:

-- The Scientific Method is a METHOD of investigation that's designed
and developed to remove the effects of human prejudice from the
collection and evaluation of evidence, and to be able to tell bogus
conclusions apart from true ones. It's the most reliable way we have
of asking and answering questions about the natural world.

-- Some questions CAN'T be studied with the Scientific Method,
because experiments generally can't be constructed. These include
matters of religion and faith. Nobody can flatly state that those are
right or wrong. We have no reliable way to say, either way.
The only way to decide is . . . faith.

-- It is illegitimate to take the answer to a question of faith that can't be
derived scientifically, and a scientifically derived conclusion, set them
down next to each other on the same table, and pretend that they can be
compared.

-- When you put them next to each other, say that they're equivalent,
and tell people "go ahead and choose one or the other", the situation
is bogus, the comparison is dishonest, and people who are untrained
or uneducated or immature are not qualified to "choose".

That's why.

This is my opinion. I could be wrong.

Personally, I happen to be a believer. But I cannot prove anything I believe
to anyone else ... not with rational argument, and not with evidence. Those are
elements of the scientific method. They're not applicable, and they don't work,
in matters of faith.

8 0

3 years ago