That kind of fallacy is called Argumentum ad Hominem. It means the argument is addressed to the person; attacking that person instead the issue. There is an irrelevance because the argument is against to the person making a claim, rather against to the claim itself. An example is judging a person's social status or attitude, like calling his strategies aren't effective to finish a certain task because of his untidiness and laziness.
Chromosomes are the rod-shaped portion of DNA
She just wants to be the best on everything, and feels bad if she gets something wrong, and probably gets embarrassed. She thinks that she has to be perfect, and always wants to have something in return.
The researchers found that the productivity of the more highly illuminated workers increased much more than that of the control group. They also found out that their productivity even improved when the lights were dimmed again. As a result, the researchers<span> concluded that it was not the changes in physical conditions that were affecting the workers' productivity. Rather, it was the fact that someone was actually concerned about their workplace.</span>
