Yes if you search up your subject or topic then put quizlet you’ll find your answer but you may need to login in to get the best experience of studying that you want
Answer:
Here's what I get
Explanation:
A. Initial observation
Gary's shell had slime and an odour.
B. Independent variable
The independent variable is the one that the experimenter changes.
There are two independent variables: the rubbing with seaweed and the drinking of Dr. Kelp.
C. The dependent variable
The dependent variable is the amount of slime and odour.
D. The conclusion
Sponge Bob can conclude that rubbing the shell with seaweed and drinking Dr. Kelp removes the slime and odour.
However, this was a poorly designed experiment. He doesn't know if it is the seaweed or the Dr. Kelp that gives the result or if he must use both together. He should change only one independent variable at a time.
You must verify that the number of atoms of each type is equal on both sides of the chemical equation: same number of C, same number of H and same number of O on both sides.
<span>A. C4H6 + 5.5O2 ---> 4CO2 + 3H2O
element reactant side product side
C 4 4
H 6 3*2 = 6
O 5.5 * 2 = 11 4*2 + 3 = 11
Then, this equation is balanced.
</span>Do the same with the other equations if you want to verify that they are not balanced.
Answer: option A.
Answer:
Project 3.
Explanation:
Project 3's anticipated cost is 12 to 17 million dollars. It is a <em>lower </em>anticipated cost than Project 2 and Project 4, but <em>higher</em> than Project 1 by one million dollars at maximum cost anticipation. Additionally, the percentage of wildlife to benefit is 70-80%, which is <em>second</em> to the most wildlife to benefit which is Project 4 at 75-80%.
And finally, for community support for Project 3 - the chart lists it as high. This outclasses Project 2 and Project 4, but balances with Project 1. However, Project 1 costs 13 to 16 million dollars and <em>only</em> benefits 15-25% of wildlife.
