It is true that the shared value creation framework aims to reconcile the concept of gaining and sustaining a competitive advantage with corporate social responsibility.
<h3>What is corporate governance?</h3>
This refers to a formal system of oversight, accountability, and control for organizational decisions and resources.
It is the set of processes and tools which controls the operations of an organization.
Learn more about corporate governance here :
brainly.com/question/13503182
#SPJ1
Answer:
Hence the null hypothesis is not rejected.
We conclude that productivity objective (in dollars) is not better than $75,000 per employee.
Explanation:
Single sample t-test ( upper tail test)
N=20
Mean =75500
Sd=18968.117
DF= 20-1=19
Table value of t at 0.05 level of significance =1.7291
Calculated t=0.1179 < table value 1.7291
The null hypothesis is not rejected
We conclude that productivity objective (in dollars) is not better than $75,000 per employee
If closing the sale is an extremely stressful point for him. If he does not close the sale, the outcome will be he will generate no income.
<h3>What is income?</h3>
Income can be defined as a the cash receive from the sales of goods and services.
Based on the given scenario in a situation were Mike did not close the sale for the day this will tend to mean that he will generate no revenue or income reason being that closing the sale will enables him to generate income.
Therefore the outcome will be he will generate no income.
Learn more about income here:brainly.com/question/25745683
Answer:
Since there are only a limited number of apartments near the city center, these apartments will be allocated based on <u>BOTH THE COSTS AND BENEFITS</u>. This process is known as <u>OPTIMIZATION.</u>
Explanation:
Optimization refers to calculating the change in net benefits between alternative choices, and choosing the alternative that provides the most benefits at the lowest costs.
For example, the cost of an apartment downtown will be much higher if measured as $ per square foot, but the advantage of saving 90 minutes of travel time a day might justify the extra cost.
If you are married and have children, then the extra cost of living downtown might be too high due to the amount of space needed for the whole family, therefore, it might be cheaper to spend 90 minutes a day travelling than paying an extremely high rent.
Answer:
i would say abu ndance of rul es
Explanation:
too many things are getting in the way.. in a way lol? its a bit ha rder to explain, but poli cy vacuu ms are about like rule s and things, like restri ctions that absolutely ha lt something, and ab undance of rule s could affect that? id k if that makes sense but i hope it helps.
