The answer is: "3" .
_______________________________
Use the Pythagorean theorem (for right triangles):
a² + b² = c² ;
in which "a = "side length 1" (unknown; for which we which to solve);
"b" = "side length 2" = "√3" (given in the figure) ;
"c" = "length of hypotenuse" = "2√3" (given in the figure);
_____________________________________________________
a² + b² = c² ;
a² = c² − b² ;
Plug in the known values for "c" and "b" ;
a² = (2√3)² − (√3)² ;
Simplify:
(2√3)² = 2² * (√3)² = 2 * 2 * (√3√3) = 4 * 3 = 12 .
(√3)² = (√3√3) = 3 .
a² = 12 − 3 = 9 .
a² = 9
Take the "positive square root" of EACH SIDE of the equation; to isolate "a" on one side of the equation; & to solve for "a" ;
+√(a²) = +√9 ;
a = 3 .
____________________________________
The answer is: "3" .
____________________________________
Answer:
Acceleration equals zero because of constant velocity

coefficient
Fr = coefficient × r
60.62= ce ×100
0.60 = coefficient
Answer:
1
Step-by-step explanation:
x-1+ 1 /5*( x-1)=0
(x-1)*6/5=0
x=1
Answer:
D
Step-by-step explanation:
Based on the SAS congruence criterion, the statement that best describes Angie's statement is:
Two triangles having two pairs of congruent sides and a pair of congruent angles do not necessarily meet the SAS congruence criterion, therefore Angie is incorrect.
<h3 /><h3>What is congruency?</h3>
The Side-Angle-Side Congruence Theorem (SAS) defines two triangles to be congruent to each other if the included angle and two sides of one is congruent to the included angle and corresponding two sides of the other triangle.
An included angle is found between two sides that are under consideration.
See image attached below that demonstrates two triangles that are congruent by the SAS Congruence Theorem.
Thus, two triangles having two pairs of corresponding sides and one pair of corresponding angles that are congruent to each other is not enough justification for proving that the two triangles are congruent based on the SAS Congruence Theorem.
The one pair of corresponding angles that are congruent MUST be "INCLUDED ANGLES".
Therefore, based on the SAS congruence criterion, the statement that best describes Angie's statement is:
Two triangles having two pairs of congruent sides and a pair of congruent angles do not necessarily meet the SAS congruence criterion, therefore Angie is incorrect.
Learn more about congruency at
brainly.com/question/14418374
#SPJ1