The factor that led to shifts in the supreme court decisions over time is that
- The ideological composition of the justices on the Supreme Court shifted to become less liberal over time.
<h3>
How the supreme court Justices became less liberal</h3>
The supreme court justices became less liberal due to the fact that a lot of these judges were conservatives.
The conservative judges were the ones that were in favor of keeping the ideals and the traditions that the country was built on.
<u>complete question:</u>
Which of the following factors most likely led to shifts in Supreme Court decision making over time?
The ideological composition of the justices on the Supreme Court shifted to become less liberal over time.
After 1960, the Supreme Court deferred to the wishes of state and local governments rather than voting to expand the authority of the federal government.
Rather than pass new legislation, Congress was inclined to refer civil rights legislation to the Supreme Court.
Constitutional amendments enabled the Supreme Court to issue more liberal decisions.
The ideological composition of the justices on the Supreme Court shifted to become less liberal over
Read more on conservatives here:brainly.com/question/8668324
Answer:
Nepal is an independent and autonomous constitutional body. It was established in the year 2000 as a statutory body under the Human Rights Commission Act 1997 (2053 BS). The Interim Constitution of Nepal 2007 (2063 BS) made the NHRC a constitutional body. It has a separate sphere of responsibilities in the constitutional legal system of the country. These responsibilities complement the responsibilities of the normal machinery of the administration of Justice, the Supreme Court, the Office of the Attorney General, the Commission for the Investigation of Abuse of Authority, and other existing executive, quasi-judicial or judicial bodies of Nepal.Explanation:
