All categories

2 years ago

Is 13/10 irrational or rational

Mathematics

2 answers:

Akimi4 [234]2 years ago

5 0

Answer:

Yes

Step-by-step explanation:

Both 13 and 10 are integers, meaning 13.10 is rational.

motikmotik2 years ago

4 0

It is rational 13/10

You might be interested in

In a smoothie the ratio of ounces of blueberries to ounces of yogurt is 4 to 5.

KonstantinChe [14]

Answer:

12.5

Step-by-step explanation:

for people who don't get another quizzez assignment about ratios from their teachers, this question showed & the correct answer was 12.5 Hope this answer somehow helps.

8 0

2 years ago

8 + 8r = 3 + 3r can anyone can help me out

MAVERICK [17]

Answer:r = -1

Step-by-step explanation:

8+8r-(3+3r)=0

We add all the numbers together, and all the variables

8r-(3r+3)+8=0

We get rid of parentheses

8r-3r-3+8=0

We add all the numbers together, and all the variables

5r+5=0

We move all terms containing r to the left, all other terms to the right

5r=-5

r=-5/5

r=-1

Hope this helps

6 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Solve the system of linear equations by substitution.<br> 2x-y=3<br> x+5y=14

Arturiano [62]

Answer:

x= 29/11 or y= 25/11

Step-by-step explanation:

2x - y= 3 ...........equation 1

x + 5y= 14 ............equation 2

Make x the subject of the formula in equation 2

x= 14 - 5y ..............equation 3

Substitute x=14 - 5y in equation 1

2(14- 5y) - y=3

28 - 10y - y=3

Collect like terms

-10y - y=3 - 28

-11y= -25

divide both sides by coefficient of y

-11y/-11 = -25/-11

y= 25/11

Substitute y= 25/11 in equation 3

x=14 - 5(25/11)

x= 14 - 125/11

x= 29/11

6 0

2 years ago

Use natural logarithms to solve the equation. Round to the nearest thousandth. 6e4x - 2 = 3

frosja888 [35]

6 · e^(4x - 2) = 3
   e^(4x - 2) = .5
ln e^(4x - 2) = ln (.5)
4x - 2 = ln (.5)
   4x = ln (.5) + 2
   x = (ln (.5) + 2)/4
   x = 0.3267
   x ≈ 0.327

Answer: B

6 0

2 years ago

In a simple regression analysis for a given data set, if the null hypothesis β = 0 is rejected, then the null hypothesis ρ = 0 i

kati45 [8]

Answer:

Null hypothesis: $\rho =0$

Alternative hypothesis: $\rho \neq 0$

The statistic to check the hypothesis is given by:

$t=\frac{r \sqrt{n-2}}{\sqrt{1-r^2}}$

And is distributed with n-2 degrees of freedom

And the statistic to check the significance of a coeffcient in a regression is given by:

$t_1 = \frac{\hat{\beta_1} -0}{S.E (\hat{\beta_1})}$

For this case is importantto remember that t1 and p value for test of slope coefficient is the same test statistic and p value for the correlation test so then the answer would be:

Always

Step-by-step explanation:

In order to test the hypothesis if the correlation coefficient it's significant we have the following hypothesis:

Null hypothesis: $\rho =0$

Alternative hypothesis: $\rho \neq 0$

The statistic to check the hypothesis is given by:

$t=\frac{r \sqrt{n-2}}{\sqrt{1-r^2}}$

And is distributed with n-2 degrees of freedom

And the statistic to check the significance of a coeffcient in a regression is given by:

$t_1 = \frac{\hat{\beta_1} -0}{S.E (\hat{\beta_1})}$

For this case is importantto remember that t1 and p value for test of slope coefficient is the same test statistic and p value for the correlation test so then the answer would be:

Always

4 0

2 years ago