Answer:
Mean weight gained of two goods is not significantly different under 0.05 or 0.01 significance level, but it is under 0.10 significance level.
Step-by-step explanation:
We need to calculate the z-statistic of the differences of sample means and compare if it is significant under a significance level.
Z-score can be calculated using the formula:
z=
where
- X is the mean weight gain for in the first three months after birth for babies using the Gibbs products.
- Y is the mean weight gain for in the first three months after birth for babies using the competitor products
- s(x) is the population standard deviation of the sample for Gibbs brand
- s(y) is the population standard deviation of the sample for competitor brand
- N(x) is the sample size for babies used Gibbs product
- N(y) is the sample size for babies used competitor product.
putting the numbers in the formula:
z=
≈ -1.51
and z-table gives that P(z<-1.51) = 0.0655
To conclude if the competitor good is significantly better, we need to choose a significance level and compare it to 0.0655.
For example, the difference in mean weight gained of two goods is not significant under 0.05 or 0.01 significance since 0.0655 is bigger than these values. But we can conclude that under 0.10 significance, competitor brand mean weight gain is significantly more than the Gibbs brand mean weight gain.
If ages are normally distributed then using a significance level of 0.05 , we can claim that the population mean is greater than 24.
Given sample mean of 25 years , sample size of 16 ,standard deviation of 2 years.
We have to find whether the population average is greater than 24.
We have to use t test because n is less than 30. It is right tailed.
We have to first form Hypothesis.
:μ>24,
:μ<24.
t=X-μ/S/
t critical at 5% significance level and degree of freedom=15 (16-1)=1.7531
t=24-25/2/
=-1/0.5
=-2
Because 1.7531 is greater than -2 so we will accept the null hypothesis.
Hence we can say that the average of population is greater than 24.
Learn more about t test at brainly.com/question/6589776
#SPJ4
<span>83.212121 or fraction form is </span>83 7/33<span> </span>
8 divided by 1/4 (25%) is 2. Therefor, it would be 10 meters.
<span> | 9 - 3g | ≤ 12
This is an example of absolute equality
it could be solved as follows:
9-3g </span>≤ 12 and -(9-3g) <span>≤ 12
</span>
-9+9-3g ≤ 12-9 and -9+9+3g <span>≤ 12+9
</span>
-3g ≤ 3 /-3 and 3g <span>≤ 21 /3
-1 </span>≤ g and g≤ 7
so the interval [-1,7] is the solution to your inequality
hope that helps