Answer:
$9327
Step-by-step explanation:
Apparently, the cost function is supposed to be ...
C(x) = 0.4x^2 -112x +17167
This can be rewritten to vertex form as ...
C(x) = 0.4(x^2 -280) +17167
C(x) = 0.4(x -140)^2 +17167 -0.4(19600)
C(x) = 0.4(x -140)^2 +9327
The vertex of the cost function is ...
(x, C(x)) = (140, 9327)
The minimum unit cost is $9327.
_____
<em>Comment on the question</em>
You found the number of units that result in minimum cost (140 units), but you have to evaluate C(140) to find the minimum unit cost.
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
LOL The graph doesn’t match the y intercept :)
Anyway
If we have point (0,-3) we have a quadratic of
y=ax^2+bx-3 we are given points (-1,0) and (2,0) so
a-b-3=0 and 4a+2b-3=0
4a+2b-3+2(a-b-3)=0
4a+2b-3+2a-2b-6=0
6a-9=0
6a=9
a=1.5, since a-b=3
1.5-b=3
b=-1.5
y=1.5x^2-1.5x-3
Answer:
9.34%
Step-by-step explanation:
p = 4%, or 0.04
n = Sample size = 667
u = Expected value = n * p = 667 * 0.04 = 26.68
SD = Standard deviation = 
= 5.06
Now, the question is if the manager is correct, what is the probability that the proportion of flops in a sample of 667 released films would be greater than 5%?
This statement implies that the p-vlaue of Z when X = 5% * 667 = 33.35
Since,
Z = (X - u) / SD
We have;
Z = (33.35 - 26.68) / 5.06
Z = 1.32
From the Z-table, the p-value of 1.32 is 0.9066
1 - 0.9066 = 0.0934, or 9.34%
Therefore, the probability that the proportion of flops in a sample of 667 released films would be greater than 5% is 9.34%.
Answer:
They are congruent
Step-by-step explanation:
They both have the sides with 15 and 12, and if you rotate it a bit it will look exactly the same.
<span>
Assign variables :
Let x = first consecutive even
Let x + 2 = second consecutive even
Let x + 4 = third consecutive even
4x = 6 + 2(x+4)
4x = 6 + 2x + 8
4x = 2x + 14
4x - 2x = 14
so your answer is 7,9and 11</span>
