1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Bad White [126]
3 years ago
11

A 6.3 μC electric charge is placed in an Electric Field with a magnitude of 5.0 x 105 charge due to the Electric Field? N/C. Wha

t is the electric force on the charge due to the electric field
Physics
1 answer:
EastWind [94]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

F = 3.15 N

Explanation:

Given electric charge, q = 6.3 μC

The magnitude of electric field, E=5\times 10^5\ N/C

We need to find the electric force on the charge due to the electric field. The electric force is given by :

F = qE

Putting all the values,

F=6.3\times 10^{-6}\times 5\times 10^5\\\\F=3.15\ N

So, the required force on the charge is 3.15 N.

You might be interested in
Can someone please help, ty!
lyudmila [28]

Answer:hypothesis: the plant died of lack  of light,moisture,or water

Explanation:

to test my hypothesis i put a plant in a room at room temp and repeat how i grew it,and observe what went wrong. hope this helps=)

5 0
4 years ago
If a scale on Earth reads 650 N, what is your mass?
OlgaM077 [116]
If the scale reads 650N, then the mass of whoever it is standing on the scale is

         (weight) / (gravity)  =  (650N) / (9.8 m/s²)  =  66.3 kilograms  .

It's not MY mass, even if I'm the one standing on the scale. 
If I stand on a scale and it reads 650 N, the scale is broken.
4 0
3 years ago
Which part of the battery is electron enriched?
dexar [7]
The answer is b. Negative terminal.
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
A fisherman notices that his boat is moving up and down periodically, owing to waves on the surface of the water. It takes 2.5 s
gulaghasi [49]

(a) 0.96 m/s

The period of the wave corresponds to the time taken for one complete oscillation of the boat, from the highest point to the highest point again. Since the time between the highest point and the lowest point is 2.5 s, the period is twice this time:

T=2\cdot 2.5 s=5.0 s

The frequency of the waves is the reciprocal of the period:

f=\frac{1}{T}=\frac{1}{5.0 s}=0.20 Hz

The wavelength instead is just the distance between two consecutive crests, so

\lambda=4.8 m

And the wave speed is given by:

v=\lambda f=(4.8 m)(0.20 Hz)=0.96 m/s

(b) 0.265 m

The total distance between the highest point of the wave and its lowest point is

d = 0.53 m

The amplitude is just the maximum displacement of the wave from the equilibrium position, so it is equal to half of this distance. So, the amplitude is

A=\frac{d}{2}=\frac{0.53 m}{2}=0.265 m

(c) Amplitude: 0.15 m, wave speed: same as before

In this case, the amplitude of the wave would be lower. In fact,

d = 0.30 m

So the amplitude would be

A=\frac{d}{2}=\frac{0.30 m}{2}=0.15 m

Instead, the wave speed would not change, since neither the frequency nor the wavelength of the wave have changed.

8 0
3 years ago
It is believed that increasing amounts of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere will result in
Jobisdone [24]

"Belief" is not involved.  

<em>Choice-A</em> is the correct answer. Except that it's not "... will result in ...".  It's already happening.

The people who have been keeping records of temperatures at a thousand places around the world, for the past hundred years, do not "believe".  They know that average global temperatures are increasing, and have been increasing steadily for a couple of Centuries now.

Working from hypotheses, models, observations, and proven laws of nature, the global scientific community are convinced that increasing amounts of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere, driven by human activity, are the cause of the trend in average global temperatures.

Yes, you can find published researchers who aren't so sure, and who disagree with this conclusion.  The scientific community is <em>never</em> 100% unanimous.  There were reasonable investigators and scientific observers who disagreed with Galileo, Newton, Faraday, Maxwell, Hawking and Einstein, in their time.  

But the voices that dispute human-caused climate change in the form of global warming are few, and they're becoming fewer as time goes on. Today, their reputation sits just a few notches above that of the Flat-Earthers, and it's continuing to sag further.

If we are to do what has to be done, in time to bring about the needed effect, it can't sag fast enough.

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Most earthquakes occur in areas close to where tectonic plates meet. There are earthquakes in San Francisco. What can be conclud
    15·2 answers
  • The speed of sound depends on ______ ?
    14·2 answers
  • When boating in shallow areas or seagrass beds, you see a mud trail in your wake where your boat has churned up the bottom. If y
    5·1 answer
  • If the acceleration was reduced 1/4 what will be the new force
    7·1 answer
  • In electromagnetic waves, frequency is inversely proportional to what?
    10·1 answer
  • Which technique is best for manual in-line stabilization of a person floating faceup on the surface?
    5·2 answers
  • What is the region around a magnet where the magnetic force is exerted?
    15·2 answers
  • Sodium chloride (NaCl) is an ionic solid. It dissolves easily in water. Which property of water allows it to dissolve NaCl? Wate
    5·1 answer
  • Can someone pls help me with this it’s due in a couple of minutes pls I would really appreciate it I will make u brainliest.
    9·1 answer
  • Describe friction force (Ffr) in your own words
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!