Answer: $3,875 Favorable
Explanation: We can compute direct labor efficiency variance by using following formula :-
Direct labor efficiency variance = standard rate ( actual hours - standard hours)
where,
standard hours = 5,500units * 0.5 hour = 2750 hours
actual hours = 3,000 hours
standard rate = $15.5
putting the values into equation we get :-
Direct labor efficiency variance = $15.5 ( 3,000 - 2750)
= $3,875 Favorable
<h2>Direct to the maintenance department</h2>
Explanation:
Jane here works only in the Maintenance department. The work that he does supports both Production as well as Research. We can calculate the expenses, only by associating the department of the employee.
So, the wages should be directly associated to the maintenance department only.
We cannot add one cost to multiple department and it is not the right approach of accounting system. So the below becomes invalid.
<em>Indirect to the production department Direct to the research department Direct to the production department Indirect to the research department</em>
Answer (1)
<em>False</em>
Explanation:
Getting a paycheck is not what most people want out of their job, <em>studies have shown that some people, contrary to the general believe actually look for other things asides paycheck from their jobs.</em> Some of these factors that encourages people into finding fulfillment in their jobs includes permanent flexibility of the working time, commitment into to health and well being of the staffs by the employer of these people, etc. <em>This factors creates a sense of purpose in the workers, encouraging them to put their body and soul into the job without thinking too much about the paycheck.</em>
Answer (2)
<em>True</em>
Explanation:
<em>Different people have different reasons for working</em>, although some just work for the paycheck, others are driven by a sense of purpose among other things. To some people, the work setting provides a sort of belonging and gives them the impression of working in a team, which is what most people actually want.
Answer (3)
<em>2. Belongingness</em>
<em></em>
Explanation:
As stated, some workers just want the setting that provides a sense of belonging and security within a team. <em>This type of workers are not too concerned with the paycheck increase that comes with a promotion if it takes them away from their perceived team.</em>
Answer:
a. linear regression.
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question it can be said that in this scenario the best choice would be a linear regression model. That is because this type of approach deals with seeing to what extent there exists a relationship between two variables. Which in this case would be the quantitative data/prices and the square footage of the home.
Answer: B. No. Imposing a price control below the equilibrium price in a market causes the quantity of the good available to consumers to fall because sellers will supply a smaller quantity, thereby causing some consumers to go without food that they would have been able to buy in the absence of the price control.
Explanation:
If price controls are introduced below the equilibrium price in the market, farmers or sellers will supply less to the market because they will not be incentivized to produce more seeing as they are not making what they should be making.
This, coupled with increased demand on account of food being cheaper, will lead to shortages which would mean that those that could have been able to afford the food at the equilibrium price would not be able to access food leading to even worse food shortages.
