All categories

3 years ago

If the earth were not tilted would there be seasons explain? Pls help

Biology

2 answers:

krek1111 [17]3 years ago

5 0

Answer:

Explanation:

If the earth was tilted, there would be small changes in temperature, but there will be no seasons. The Earth's axis is now inclined at around 24 degrees. This is the main reason for the changing of the seasons. The Northern Hemisphere is in the warm season when the Earth is slanted toward the sun, and the Northern Hemisphere is in the cold season when the Earth is slanted away from the sun. The cycle repeats itself every year because the Earth rotates around the sun at a known and generally constant rate. The sun is higher in the sky during the warm season, making it warmer, and lower in the sky during the cool season, making it colder.

Hope this helps :)

-jp524

Dmitry [639]3 years ago

4 0

Answer:

Um.................. What i think is No

Explanation:

You might be interested in

Nitrogen is a critical component of what organic compounds?

BartSMP [9]

Answer:

Nitrogen is a naturally occurring element that is essential for growth and reproduction in both plants and animals. It is found in amino acids that make up proteins, in nucleic acids, that comprise the hereditary material and life's blueprint for all cells, and in many other organic and inorganic compounds.

Explanation:

(I just copy and paste from google)

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

What is photosynthesis??? . . .take a free pts

FrozenT [24]

Thanks ya...✌✌

the process by which green plants and some other organisms use sunlight to synthesize nutrients from carbon dioxide and water. Photosynthesis in plants generally involves the green pigment chlorophyll and generates oxygen as a by-product.

3 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

The Offspring produced by a cross between two given types of plants can be any of the three genotypes denoted by A, B, and C. A

ratelena [41]

Complete question:

The offspring produced between two given types of plants can be any of the three genotypes, denoted by A, B and C. A theoretical model of gene inheritance suggests that the offspring of types A, B and C should be in a 1:2:1 ratio (meaning 25% A, 50% B, and 25% C). For experimental verification, 100 plants are bred by crossing the two given types. Their genetic classifications are recorded in the table below.

Genotype Observed frequency

A → 18 individuals

B → 55 individuals

C → 27 individuals

Do these contradict the genetic model?

Use a 0.05 level of significance.

Determine the chi-square test statistic.

Answer:

Do these contradict the genetic model? No, according to the chi-square test, there is not enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis of the population being in equilibrium.

Explanation:

Available data:

Crossed genotypes: two
Genotypes among the offspring; Three → A, B, and C
Expected phenotypic ratio → 1:2:1
Total number of individuals, N = 100
A = 18 individuals
B = 55 individuals
C = 27 individuals

So, let us first state the hypothesis:

H₀= the population is equilibrium for this locus → F(A) = 25%, F(B) = 50%, F(C) = 25%
H₁ = the population is not in equilibrium

Now, let us calculate the number of expected individuals, according to their expected ratio.

4 -------------- 100% -------------100 individuals

1 --------------- 25% -------------X = 25 individuals A

2 -------------- 50% -------------X = 50 individuals B

1----------------- 25%--------------X = 25 individuals C

A B C

Observed 18 55 27
Expected 25 50 25
(Obs-Exp)²/Exp 1.96 0.5 0.16

(Obs-Exp)²/Exp

A) (18 - 25)²/25 = 49/25 = 1.96

B) (55 - 50)² / 50 = 25/50 = 0.5

C) (27 - 25)²/25 = 4/25 = 0.16

Chi square = X² = Σ(Obs-Exp)²/Exp

∑ is the sum of the terms
O are the Observed individuals: 2 in chamber B, and 18 in chamber A.
E are the Expected individuals: 10 in each chamber

X² = ∑ ((O-E)²/E) = 1.96 + 0.5 + 0.16 = 2.62

Freedom degrees = 2

Significance level, 5% = 0.05

Table value/Critical value = 5.99

X² < Critical value

2.62 < 5.99

These results suggest that there is not enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis. We can assume that the locus under study in this population is in equilibrium H-W.

6 0

3 years ago

A chemical bonding tells what

Vinvika [58]

A chemical bonding is a lasting attraction is atoms molecules or ions.There are three main types of bonds: ionic, covalent and metallic. These bonds occur when electrons are transferred from one atom two another, and are a result of the attraction between the resulting oppositely charged ions. This happens between atoms with an electronegativity difference generally larger than 1.8.

6 0

3 years ago

About 3 million years ago, the Isthmus of Panama (a narrow strip of land connecting North and South America) formed, dividing ma

lilavasa [31]

Answer:

Allopatric speciation

Explanation:

Allopatric speciation refers to the geographic separation of a continuous genetic background, originating two or more new geographically isolated groups. These divergences of the original population might be related to migration in different directions, extinction of geographically intermediate populations, or geological events. During these events of speciation, emerging new barriers impede genetic flow between groups, as the two new populations that are separated can not get together and mate anymore. These barriers might be geographical or ecological.

Different stages are involved in the allopatric speciation process:

• The emergence of the barrier.

• Interruption in the genetic flow

• Slow and gradual differentiation due to the occurrence of mutations in each population and their accumulation in time.

• Genetic divergence by natural selection and reproductive isolation, impeding the two groups to mate even if the barrier disappears.

• Prezigotic isolation mechanisms favored by selection a secondary contact between the new species occurs.

The Panama isthmus is an example of allopatric speciation caused by an extrinsic geological barrier that interrupted the genetic flow between species driving to genetic changes and reproductive isolation.

Two different groups that evolved in allopatry might meet again in secondary contact if the barrier that separated them, disappears. In the Panama isthmus example, the groups that did mate, could not produce any fertile progeny because of postzygotic reproductive isolation. And the groups that did not mate, were not attracted to each other because of prezygotic reproductive isolation.

4 0

3 years ago