Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:
<h3>Trigonometry:</h3>


You can solve this by using the system of equations.
Jan - 4.95 = 2H + 3C
Wayne - 5.45 = 3H + 2C
Use elimination.
-3(2H + 3C = 4.95)
2(3H + 2C = 5.45)
Solve. And you'll get:
-6H + (-9C) = -14.85
6H + 4C = 10.9
Cross out -6H and 6H because they cancel out. And you're left with:
-9C = -14.85
4C = 10.9
Add -9C with 4C, and -14.85 with 10.9.
-5C = -3.95
Divide each side with -5.
C = $0.79
Now to figure out what H is, just substitute the C in one of the equations with 0.79.
5.45 = 3H + 2(0.79)
5.45 = 3H + 1.58
-1.58 -1.58
3.87 = 3H
3.87/3 = 3/3(H)
1.29 = H
Finished!
Answer:
You did not include the price they bought the units at.
I will assume this price is $5.
= 5 * 1,000
= $5,000
Recording it will be:
Account Debit Credit
Merchandise Inventory $5,000
Accounts Payable $5,000
Plural for index you are wecome bud
Answer:
No, there is not sufficient evidence to support the claim that the bags are underfilled
Step-by-step explanation:
A manufacturer of potato chips would like to know whether its bag filling machine works correctly at the 434 gram setting.
This means that the null hypothesis is:

It is believed that the machine is underfilling the bags.
This means that the alternate hypothesis is:

The test statistic is:

In which X is the sample mean,
is the value tested at the null hypothesis,
is the standard deviation and n is the size of the sample.
434 is tested at the null hypothesis:
This means that 
A 9 bag sample had a mean of 431 grams with a variance of 144.
This means that 
Value of the test-statistic:



P-value of the test:
The pvalue of the test is the pvalue of z = -0.75, which is 0.2266
0.2266 > 0.01, which means that there is not sufficient evidence to support the claim that the bags are underfilled.