Answer:
you wrote that wrong cause ur answer is 0.01225490196
Step-by-step explanation:
<h3>
Answer: Choice A. Graph (1)</h3>
Reasoning:
If it is at all possible to draw a single vertical line through more than one point on the curve, then the graph is not a function. With graphs (2), (3) and (4), we can draw a vertical line through more than one point on those curves, so they aren't functions. Graph (1) is the only thing left. This graph is a function because it is not possible to draw a single vertical line through more than one point. It passes the vertical line test. Any input (x) leads to exactly one and only one y output.
Nice work on getting the correct answer when you chose "graph (1)".
21x -15 + 5 = 10x - 5
21x -5 = 10x
11x = 5
x = 5/11
Answer:
51 m^2
Step-by-step explanation:
The shaded area is the difference between the area of the overall figure and that of the rectangular cutout.
The applicable formulas are ...
area of a triangle:
A = (1/2)bh
area of a rectangle:
A = bh
area of a trapezoid:
A = (1/2)(b1 +b2)h
___
We note that the area of a triangle depends only on the length of its base and its height. The actual shape does not matter. Thus, we can shift the peak of the triangular portion of the shape (that portion above the top horizontal line) so that it lines up with one vertical side or the other of the figure. That makes the overall shape a trapezoid with bases 16 m and 10 m. The area of that trapezoid is then ...
A = (1/2)(16 m + 10 m)(5 m) = 65 m^2
The area of the white internal rectangle is ...
A = (2 m)(7 m) = 14 m^2
So, the shaded area is the difference:
65 m^2 -14 m^2 = 51 m^2 . . . . shaded area of the composite figure
_____
<em>Alternate approach</em>
Of course, you can also figure the area by adding the area of the triangular "roof" to the area of the larger rectangle, then subtracting the area of the smaller rectangle. Using the above formulas, that approach gives ...
(1/2)(5 m)(16 m - 10 m) + (5 m)(10 m) - (2 m)(7 m) = 15 m^2 + 50 m^2 -14 m^2
= 51 m^2