<h2>Modern Abiogenesis Hypothesis</h2>
Explanation:
- American physicists Harold Urey and Stanley Miller consolidated warm water with water fume, methane, smelling salts, and atomic hydrogen. These beat with electrical releases. These parts were intended to recreate the crude sea, prebiotic air, warmth, and lighting
- After seven days they found that basic natural atoms, for example, amino acids had framed
- Hence the Miller-Urey try effectively delivered atoms from inorganic parts thought to have been available on the prebiotic earth
- Hence, the right answer is "Modern abiogenesis hypothesis is based on Oparin- Haldane theory and Miller- Urey experiment"
Answer:
Good night, Casca. See you tomorrow. Walk safely
Explanation:
The qualitative-quantitavtive debate can trigger an intense debate. To say that one or the other approach is better is a trivializing of a far more complex topic than a dichotomous choice. ... Qualitative data typically consists of words while quantitative data consists of numbers.
The use of artificial fertilizer has helped the tomato plant to grow faster and taller.
- Natural fertilizers such as plant and animal wastes are considered eco-friendly as they are not harmful to the environment. They add nutrients to the soil in a natural way and do not degrade the soil. But, their impact is slow and cannot fulfil all the lacking nutrients.
- On the other hand, artificial fertilisers are harmful to the environment as they degrade the soil
- Still, the farmers prefer artificial fertilizers over natural fertilizers. This is because they help the plant to grow faster and taller by fulfilling the requirement of all lacking nutrients.
Thus, tomato plants are grown faster and taller due to the use of artificial fertilizers. Artificial fertilizers have a greater impact than natural fertilizers and provide the soil with the required nutrients.
Learn more about artificial fertilizers here:
brainly.com/question/2858069
#SPJ10
