Answer:
United States Supreme Court case in which the Court instituted an exclusionary rule exception allowing evidence obtained through a warrant less search to be valid when a police record erroneously indicates the existence of an outstanding warrant due to negligent conduct of a Clerk of Court.
Explanation:
Answer:
The police had never encountered a ransom request before.
Explanation:
The parents of the baby being aviators and working in the aviation sector made them to be popular.But what actually made it to be dubbed "Crime of the century"was because, there was no request of ransom but rather, the child was killed. This made the congress to pass a federal law against kidnapping.
Answer:
true
Explanation:
because a jacket is a person property, Similar to theft, larceny is the taking of property with the intent of depriving the owner of its use. Petty or simple larceny is usually a misdemeanor and involves theft of property less than the local threshold for grand larceny, while grand larceny is typically a felony. Examples are thefts of bicycles, thefts of motor vehicle parts and accessories, shoplifting, pocket-picking. So therefore taking someone's jacket believing is your own is still larceny.
Answer:
The simple answer is yes a female should be paid the same, but often this is not the case.
Explanation:
Morally, yes a female with the same qualifications and experience should be paid the same salary as the counterpart prior to her, though it is not a law that there can't be a wage gap between women and men and this is most commonly not a reality. Women are often paid less than men with the same degree, qualifications, and experience, especially if the woman is part of a racial minority, or in a male dominated industry. Often, employers are able to find loopholes and reasons, "justifying" this unjust wage gap.
