Based on the given scenario above, the correct answer for this would be option A. So based on Jessica's situation, the condition that the scenario describes would be UNLIMITED PERSONAL LIABILITY. Unlimited liability<span> refers to the legal obligations that one must assume. Hope this is the answer that you are looking for. </span>
Answer:
The answer is C: 14300
Note: The actual answer is 14296, <em>and </em>the closest to that was option C.
Explanation:
Formula to calculate forecast using Exponential smoothing:
Where,
= New Forecast 
= Previous period's forecast.
= Smoothing Constant 
= Previous period's Actual Demand.
- Calculating the forecast for period 5:
Data:
Putting <em>values in the formula:</em>
Solution :
Let us suppose that a company cannot predict the market value of an equipment that acquired by the reference to the similar purchase for the cash. Thus the company finds cost of purchased of the equipment by exchanging :
-- the market price of the bonds when they have an established price in the market.
-- the market price of the bonds when the common stocks does not have a established market price.
-- market price of the equipment when the similar kind of an equipment have a determinable value in the market.
The selling price of the price that is offered to the buyer of the goods. The selling price of the car should be $<u><em>75,000</em></u>.
<h3>What is the selling price?</h3>
The selling price is the ultimate value of the goods the seller is willing to offer to the buyer at the time of sale. It is determined by adding up the profit margin to the actual cost of the goods.
The computation of the selling price of the car:
Given,
- Cost price =$60,000
- Margin =25%
Therefore, if Sherry wants to make 25% on the sale of each car then the car must be sold at $75,000 each.
Learn more about selling price, here:
brainly.com/question/3798799
Answer:
III only.
Cultural attitudes toward antitrust law differ.
Explanation:
Competition law is an area of law that seeks to maintain a level playing field for all participants in an industry by protecting them against anti-competitive conduct by companies.
For example two major players in an industry may collaborate to raise price of goods.
However in foreign competition law we have to consider that cultural attitudes towards antitrust law differs. What is accepted in one country may not apply in another. So there is absence of litigation when considering competition in the foreign scene.
