1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
sasho [114]
3 years ago
13

What fraction of states have to agree to a new amendment to the

Social Studies
1 answer:
Gennadij [26K]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

<h3>urhidbfgdugdhgif3636374ut87457578585858tufjgrirbrjbfifjfjhdirhodgkthtofnnthrntothjr</h3>

Explanation:

kaakkskskskskjsjskksjsjsjdnis shdjenensjbsjsbejjejejejehnehehbejebsubeishjejejneje euebuebwuebeuebheueuwhwheueheij3ej

You might be interested in
How was judicial review used in Dred scott
Ratling [72]
In the second time ever, the Court used<span> its power of </span>judicial review<span> to rule an act of Congress (the Missouri Compromise) unconstitutional. ... Northerners charged that after Chief Justice Taney had shown that </span>Scott<span>, as a Negro, had no right to bring a case into a federal court, he should have ended his decision.</span>
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
PLS WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST Write about how news papers allow us to preserve culture/ record important cultural events and add a pi
emmasim [6.3K]

Answer:

Since 1896, The New York Times has printed the phrase “All the News That’s Fit to Print” as its masthead motto. The phrase itself seems innocent enough, and it has been published for such a long time now that many probably skim over it without giving it a second thought. Yet, the phrase represents an interesting phenomenon in the newspaper industry: control. Papers have long been criticized for the way stories are presented, yet newspapers continue to print—and readers continue to buy them.

In 1997, The New York Times publicly claimed that it was “an independent newspaper, entirely fearless, free of ulterior influence and unselfishly devoted to the public welfare (Herman, 1998).” Despite this public proclamation of objectivity, the paper’s publishers have been criticized for choosing which articles to print based on personal financial gain. In reaction to that statement, scholar Edward S. Herman wrote that the issue is that The New York Times “defin[es] public welfare in a manner acceptable to their elite audience and advertisers (Herman, 1998).” The New York Times has continually been accused of determining what stories are told. For example, during the 1993 debate over the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), The New York Times clearly supported the agreement. In doing so, the newspaper exercised editorial control over its publication and the information that went out to readers.

However, The New York Times is not the only newspaper to face accusations of controlling which stories are told. In his review of Read All About It: The Corporate Takeover of America’s Newspapers, Steve Hoenisch, editor of Criticism.com, offers these harsh words about what drives the stories printed in today’s newspapers:

I’ve always thought of daily newspapers as the guardians of our—meaning the public’s—right to know. The guardians of truth, justice, and public welfare and all that. But who am I fooling? America’s daily newspapers don’t belong to us. Nor, for that matter, do they even seek to serve us any longer. They have more important concerns now: appeasing advertisers and enriching stockholders (Hoenisch).

More and more, as readership declines, newspapers must answer to advertisers and shareholders as they choose which stories to report on.

However, editorial control does not end there. Journalists determine not only what stories are told but also how those stories are presented. This issue is perhaps even more delicate than that of selection. Most newspaper readers still expect news to be reported objectively and demand that journalists present their stories in this manner. However, careful public scrutiny can burden journalists, while accusations of controlling information affect their affiliated newspapers. However, this scrutiny takes on importance as the public turns to journalists and newspapers to learn about the world.

Journalists are also expected to hold themselves to high standards of truth and originality. Fabrication and plagiarism are prohibited. If a journalist is caught using these tactics, then his or her career is likely to end for betraying the public’s trust and for damaging the publication’s reputation. For example, The New York Times reporter Jayson Blair lost his job in 2003 when his plagiary and fabrication were discovered, and The New Republic journalist Stephen Glass was fired in 1998 for inventing stories, quotes, and sources.

Despite the critiques of the newspaper industry and its control over information, the majority of newspapers and journalists take their roles seriously. Editors work with journalists to verify sources and to double-check facts so readers are provided accurate information. In this way, the control that journalists and newspapers exert serves to benefit their readers, who can then be assured that articles printed are correct.

The New York Times Revisits Old Stories

Despite the criticism of The New York Times, the famous newspaper has been known to revisit their old stories to provide a new, more balanced view. One such example occurred in 2004 when, in response to criticism on their handling of the Iraq War, The New York Times offered a statement of apology. The apology read:

We have found a number of instances of coverage that was not as rigorous as it should have been. In some cases, information that was controversial then, and seems questionable now, was insufficiently qualified or allowed to stand unchallenged. Looking back, we wish we had been more aggressive in re-examining the claims as new evidence emerged—or failed to emerge (New York Times, 2004).

Although the apology was risky—it essentially admitted guilt in controlling a controversial story—The New York Times demonstrated a commitment to ethical journalism.

4 0
3 years ago
(1) is made of earth's crust and
stiv31 [10]

Answer:

What do we HAVE to answer in this question, pls tell that and i will give better answer

3 0
3 years ago
Silk is actually made from the cocoon of what creature
mars1129 [50]

Answer:

Silkworm or fibroin

5 0
3 years ago
Denji, a 44-year-old man, almost gets hit by a car while crossing a road. he suddenly remembers being in a terrible car accident
I am Lyosha [343]
Psychologists would call this recovered memory.
Denji was in a car accident when he was a small child, however, he managed to repress/forget about that until he was almost hit by a car again when he was an adult. This brought his memory to the surface and he suddenly recovered that memory he thought didn't even exist.
8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The flying shuttle allowed weavers to make wider pieces of cloth. Who was the inventor?
    8·1 answer
  • Mrs. Wishy from the "Help You, Help Me" clinic strongly believes that psychological disorders are due to the contributions of ex
    9·1 answer
  • As the Human Resource manager for New Millennium Enterprises, you hold a face to face meeting with all potential employees in wh
    6·2 answers
  • What should you be doing while the negative is presenting a claim and evidence? Check all that apply. paying attention to what t
    15·2 answers
  • What advantage(s) did the internet offer society?
    6·1 answer
  • Whats is the only continent that has one national government.
    14·2 answers
  • What is adolescence<br>​
    14·2 answers
  • Give reasons why some people might be ‘chosen’ over others in Judaism.
    9·1 answer
  • What where farm conditions like in north carolina during 1800-1830
    15·1 answer
  • according to the model of democracy, political parties are essential in making government responsive to public opinion. quizlet
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!