A “mr and mrs.Jaden” indicates that they are married.
Answer:
The types of damages that would be needed in order for them to be equally happy as they were before the garage fiasco are:
a) Compensatory damages
b) Consequential damages
Explanation:
a) Compensatory Damages are claims paid to directly to compensate the non-breaching party for the value of what was damaged, not done, or performed. For this purpose, compensatory damages will be equal to the cost of getting the garages fixed.
b) Consequential Damages address the costs incurred by the non-breaching party as a result of damages done to other facilities. Example, the sliding off of the garage could have led to flood water damaging some other property, which were not the direct subject of the claim.
<u>No</u><u> </u><u>criminal</u><u> </u><u>crime</u><u> </u><u>should</u><u> </u><u>not</u><u> </u><u>be</u><u> </u><u>heard</u><u> </u><u>judges</u><u> </u><u>other</u><u> </u><u>than</u><u> </u><u>professional</u><u> </u><u>and</u><u> </u><u>paid</u><u> </u><u>judges</u><u> </u><u>because</u><u> </u><u>they</u><u> </u><u>have</u><u> </u><u>a</u><u> </u><u>lot</u><u> </u><u>of</u><u> </u><u>experience</u><u> </u><u>about</u><u> </u><u>these</u><u> </u><u>kinds</u><u> </u><u>of</u><u> </u><u>cases</u>
The SCOTUS did not rule that T.L.O’s 4th amendment (searches and seizures) rights had been violated. They ruled that the school administrations search of the bag was reasonable under the circumstances (i.e T.L.O. Being a minor and on school property, meaning that while at school, administration is responsible for the well-being and safety of all students, thus allowing them to search T.L.O’s bag for marijuana). A good way to think of it is that while you’re at school, the administration acts as your parents. Your parents don’t need a warrant to search through your room and neither does the administration if you are on school property. The 4th amendment applies to this case because it protects against unlawful searches and seizures (i.e. searches and seizures that are without a warrant). The constitutional question was whether or not T.L.O. Could be charged with a crime/punished or not because the school administration did not have a warrant. However, because the school administration was acting as a loco parentis (latin term for “in place of the parent”) they did not need a warrant to search her bag. Hope this helped!
