See the attached diagram.
In the right triangle, x is opposite the 23.6 degree angle, and the adjacent side is 250 m. This suggests using the tangent ratio.

Finally, to get the height of the tree, add Sarah's height, 1.5 m.
The tree is approximately 110.7m tall.
![\bf \qquad \qquad \textit{direct proportional variation} \\\\ \textit{\underline{y} varies directly with \underline{x}}\qquad \qquad y=kx\impliedby \begin{array}{llll} k=constant\ of\\ \qquad variation \end{array} \\\\[-0.35em] \rule{34em}{0.25pt}\\\\ y = 4\frac{2}{3}x\qquad \qquad yes\qquad \checkmark\qquad \qquad k = 4\frac{2}{3} \\\\[-0.35em] ~\dotfill\\\\ y=3(x-1)\implies \stackrel{\textit{distributing}}{y=3x-3}\qquad \qquad yes\qquad \checkmark \qquad \qquad k=3](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cbf%20%5Cqquad%20%5Cqquad%20%5Ctextit%7Bdirect%20proportional%20variation%7D%20%5C%5C%5C%5C%20%5Ctextit%7B%5Cunderline%7By%7D%20varies%20directly%20with%20%5Cunderline%7Bx%7D%7D%5Cqquad%20%5Cqquad%20y%3Dkx%5Cimpliedby%20%5Cbegin%7Barray%7D%7Bllll%7D%20k%3Dconstant%5C%20of%5C%5C%20%5Cqquad%20variation%20%5Cend%7Barray%7D%20%5C%5C%5C%5C%5B-0.35em%5D%20%5Crule%7B34em%7D%7B0.25pt%7D%5C%5C%5C%5C%20y%20%3D%204%5Cfrac%7B2%7D%7B3%7Dx%5Cqquad%20%5Cqquad%20yes%5Cqquad%20%5Ccheckmark%5Cqquad%20%5Cqquad%20k%20%3D%204%5Cfrac%7B2%7D%7B3%7D%20%5C%5C%5C%5C%5B-0.35em%5D%20~%5Cdotfill%5C%5C%5C%5C%20y%3D3%28x-1%29%5Cimplies%20%5Cstackrel%7B%5Ctextit%7Bdistributing%7D%7D%7By%3D3x-3%7D%5Cqquad%20%5Cqquad%20yes%5Cqquad%20%5Ccheckmark%20%5Cqquad%20%5Cqquad%20k%3D3)
bear in mind that, direct proportional equations have a y-intercept.
for y = kx, is pretty much y = kx + 0, where 0 = y-intercept.
and the "k" constant of proportionality, is pretty much just its slope.
Answer:
b i think
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
16.1157
Step-by-step explanation:
Using theorem about secant segments we can write,
AB*AH=AG*AC
AC=4,
CG=6
AG=AC+CG=4+6=10
AH=3
AB= AH+HB=AH+x=3+x
(3+x)*3=10*4
9+3x=40
3x=40-9
3x=31
x=31/3≈10.3
HB≈10.3
EG=HB/2 (as radius and diameter)
EG=10.3/2≈5.2