Answer:
3.4 - 2.8d + 2.8d - 1.3 = 2.1
Step-by-step explanation:
The given expression is 3.4 -2.8d + 2.8d -1.3
Let's see the definition of like terms.
Like terms are the terms having the same variable and the same exponents.
Examples: -3xy, 2xy and 4y, 5y and -3, 2.
Now let's identify the like terms from the given expression.
3.4 -2.8d + 2.8d -1.3
Here the like terms are -2.8d, +2.8d and 3.4, -1.3
3.4 -2.8d + 2.8d -1.3
= -2.8d + 2.8d + 3.4 - 1.3 [-2.8d + 2.8d = 0] and 3.4 -1.3 = 2.1
= 0 + 2.1
=2.1
The answer is 2.1
Answer:
D. "If the graph of two variables is not a linear function, then the two variables are not directly proportional"
Step-by-step explanation:
The contrapositive of a statement is basically you changing the conditional part of the statement with its result and then finding the negative of both. This is called Contraposition.
So, for the statement given:
"If two variables are directly proportional, then their graph is a linear function."
The contrapositive will be:
"If the graph of two variables is not a linear function, then the two variables are not directly proportional"
Answer: A) B.
B) D.
C) D.
Step-by-step explanation: It’s easy, next time show the people the image of the question, because how do you expect us to answer it?
Answer:
- 6.04 km (per angle marks)
- 5.36 km (per side hash marks)
Step-by-step explanation:
Going by the angle indicators, the ratios of corresponding sides of the similar triangles are ...
x/2000 = 4200/3500
x = 2000·6/5 = 2400 . . . . yards
Then the distance of interest is ...
(2400 yd + 4200 yd)×(0.0009144 km/yd) = 6.6×.9144 km
= 6.03504 km ≈ 6.04 km
_____
Going by the red hash marks, the ratios of corresponding sides of the similar triangles are ...
x/2000 = 3500/4200
x = 2000·(5/6) = 5000/3 . . . . yards
Then the distance of interest is ...
(5000/3 + 4200) yd × 0.0009144 km/yd ≈ 5.36 km
_____
<em>Comment on the figure</em>
The usual geometry here is that the outside legs (opposite the vertical angles) are parallel, meaning that the angle indicators are the correct marks. It is possible, but unusual, for the red hash marks to be correct and the angle indicators to be mismarked. The red hash marks seem tentatively drawn, so seem like they're more likely to be the incorrect marks.
Even integers are in form 2n where n is a whole number
consecutive even integers are 2 apart
2n and 2n+2
2n is 10 more than 1/2 of (2n+2)
2n=10+1/2(2n+2)
2n=10+n+1
2n=11+n
minus n both sides
n=11
2n=22
2n+2=24
the numbers are 22 and 24
