Answer:
2/3
Step-by-step explanation:
Let n = the repeating, non-terminating number 0.666...
We now have n = 0.666666...
We want the number n in the form of a fraction.
Since only 1 digit repeats, the 6, use a 1 followed by 1 zero, which means the number 10. Now multiply both sides by 10 and write the original equation below it.
10n = 6.666666...
n = 0.666666...
Subtract the bottom equation from the top equation.
9n = 6
n = 6/9
n = 2/3
Answer:
Video Games = $5.25
Movies = $1.25
Step-by-step explanation:
(3x + 5y = 30)2
6x + 2y = 18
Video Games (y) = 5.25
6x + 10y = 60
<u>- 6x + 2y = 18 </u>
(8y)/8 = (42)/8
<u> </u>
6x + 2(5.25) = 18
6x + 10.5 = 18
6x = 7.5
x = 1.25
Double Check by plugging in the numbers
Answer:
The area of one slice of pizza is 18 in²
Step-by-step explanation:
First we have to know that the 360 ° representing the circle expressed in radians are expressed as 2π
Now we must calculate the area of the circle
a = π * r²
a = π * (12in)²
a = 144π in²
Now that we have the area of the circumference we multiply it by (π/4) / (2π)
144π in² * (π/4) / (2π) =
144 in² * 1/8 =
18 in²
The area of one slice of pizza is 18 in²
The function shown in the graph is increasing over the interval (-1, 0) and (1, ∞). It is decreasing over the interval (-∞, -1) and (0, 1). The function does not remain constant.
<h3>What is an
equation?</h3>
An equation is an expression that shows the relationship between two or more variables and numbers.
The function shown in the graph is increasing over the interval (-1, 0) and (1, ∞). It is decreasing over the interval (-∞, -1) and (0, 1). The function does not remain constant.
Find out more on equation at: brainly.com/question/2972832
#SPJ1
Answer:
Yes, this is a valid inference because she took a random sample of the neighborhood.
Step-by-step explanation:
As her survey was non bias and completely random and she found that 15% of the families would participate in the event. She claims that 15% of the neighborhood families would be expected to participate in the sports event. So, yes, this is a valid inference because she took a random sample of the neighborhood.
