Answer:
The number of moles of KClO₃ reacted was 0,15 mol
Explanation:
For the reaction:
2KClO₃(s) → 2KCl(s) + 2O₂(g)
The only gas product is O₂.
Total pressure is the sum of vapor pressure of water with O₂ gas formed. Thus, pressure of O₂ is:
749mmHg - 23,8mmHg = 725,2mmHg
Using gas law:
PV/RT = n
Where:
P is pressure (725,2mmHg ≡ <em>0,9542atm</em>)
V is volume (<em>5,76L</em>)
R is gas constant (<em>0,082 atmL/molK</em>)
And T is temperature (25°C ≡ <em>298,15K</em>)
Replacing, number of moles of O₂ are <em>0,2248 moles</em>
As 2 moles of KClO₃ react with 3 moles of O₂ the moles of KClO₃ that reacted was:
0,2248 mol O₂×
= <em>0,15 mol of KClO₃</em>
I hope it helps!
Q=m°C<span>ΔT
=(500g) x (1 cal/g.</span>°C) x (48°C-21°C) = 13500 cal
13500 cal / 1000 = 13.5 kcal
<span>"What is the caloric value (kcal/g) of the french fries?"
13.5 kcal/ 2.5 g = 5.4 kcal/g</span>
Energy is distributed not just in translational KE, but also in rotation, vibration and also distributed in electronic energy levels (if input great enough, bond breaks).
All four forms of energy are quantised and the quanta ‘gap’ differences increases from trans. KE ==> electronic.
Entropy (S) and energy distribution: The energy is distributed amongst the energy levels in the particles to maximise their entropy.
Entropy is a measure of both the way the particles are arranged AND the ways the quanta of energy can be arranged.
We can apply ΔSθsys/surr/tot ideas to chemical changes to test feasibility of a reaction:
ΔSθtot = ΔSθsys + ΔSθsurr
ΔSθtot must be >=0 for a chemical change to be feasible.
For example: CaCO3(s) ==> CaO(s) + CO2(g)
ΔSθsys = ΣSθproducts – ΣSθreactants
ΔSθsys = SθCaO(s) + SθCO2(g) – SθCaCO3(s)
ΔSθsurr is –ΔHθ/T(K) and ΔH is very endothermic (very +ve),
Now ΔSθsys is approximately constant with temperature and at room temperature the ΔSθsurr term is too negative for ΔSθtot to be plus overall.
But, as the temperature is raised, the ΔSθsurr term becomes less negative and eventually at about 800oCΔSθtot becomes plus overall (and ΔGθ becomes negative), so the decomposition is now chemically, and 'commercially' feasible in a lime kiln.
CaCO3(s) ==> CaO(s) + CO2(g) ΔHθ = +179 kJ mol–1 (very endothermic)
This important industrial reaction for converting limestone (calcium carbonate) to lime (calcium oxide) has to be performed at high temperatures in a specially designed limekiln – which these days, basically consists of a huge rotating angled ceramic lined steel tube in which a mixture of limestone plus coal/coke/oil/gas? is fed in at one end and lime collected at the lower end. The mixture is ignited and excess air blasted through to burn the coal/coke and maintain a high operating temperature.
ΔSθsys = ΣSθproducts – ΣSθreactants
ΔSθsys = SθCaO(s) + SθCO2(g) – SθCaCO3(s) = (40.0) + (214.0) – (92.9) = +161.0 J mol–1 K–1
ΔSθsurr is –ΔHθ/T = –(179000/T)
ΔSθtot = ΔSθsys + ΔSθsurr
ΔSθtot = (+161) + (–179000/T) = 161 – 179000/T
If we then substitute various values of T (in Kelvin) you can calculate when the reaction becomes feasible.
For T = 298K (room temperature)
ΔSθtot = 161 – 179000/298 = –439.7 J mol–1 K–1, no good, negative entropy change
For T = 500K (fairly high temperature for an industrial process)
ΔSθtot = 161 – 179000/500 = –197.0, still no good
For T = 1200K (limekiln temperature)
ΔSθtot = 161 – 179000/1200 = +11.8 J mol–1 K–1, definitely feasible, overall positive entropy change
Now assuming ΔSθsys is approximately constant with temperature change and at room temperature the ΔSθsurr term is too negative for ΔSθtot to be plus overall. But, as the temperature is raised, the ΔSθsurr term becomes less negative and eventually at about 800–900oC ΔSθtot becomes plus overall, so the decomposition is now chemically, and 'commercially' feasible in a lime kiln.
You can approach the problem in another more efficient way by solving the total entropy expression for T at the point when the total entropy change is zero. At this point calcium carbonate, calcium oxide and carbon dioxide are at equilibrium.
ΔSθtot–equilib = 0 = 161 – 179000/T, 179000/T = 161, T = 179000/161 = 1112 K
This means that 1112 K is the minimum temperature to get an economic yield. Well at first sight anyway. In fact because the carbon dioxide is swept away in the flue gases so an equilibrium is never truly attained so limestone continues to decompose even at lower temperatures.
Answer:
The percent yield of the reaction is 82%
Explanation:
First step: make the chemist equation.
2 Al (s) + Fe2O3 (s) → 2 Fe (s) + Al2O3 (s)
As the statement says that aluminun is in excess, the limiting reactant is the Fe2O3
Second step: Find out the moles in the reactant.
Molar weight Fe2O3: 159.7 g/m
Mass / Molar weight = moles
50 g /159.7 g/m = 0.313 moles
Third step: Analyse the reaction. 1 mol of Fe2O3 makes 2 moles of Fe.
1 mol Fe2O3 ____ 2Fe
0.313 mol Fe2O3 ____ 0.626 moles
Molar weight Fe = 55.85 g/m
Moles . molar weight = mass
55.85g/m . 0.626m = 34.9 grams
This will be the 100% yield of the reaction but we only made 28.65 g
34.9 g ____ 100%
28.65 g ____ 82.09 %
Yep u right bro but like you know I’m here with these guys you know what I mean tho
