I agree. From the calculation, the total <em>amount spent </em><em>is </em><em>less than</em><em> (<)the amount in his pocket</em>, this means that <em>Rashaj can buy 5 boxes of candy. </em>
Inequalities are expressions that are not always equal to each other. The inequality signs are <, > ≤ and ≥
Given the following
Amount Rashaj has in his wallet = $37.25
Amount spent
A movie ticket = $7.25
5 boxes of candy at $3.75 per box = 5($3.75) = $18.75
Taking the sum of the total amount spent
Amount spent = $7.25 + $18.75
Amount spent = $26
Since the total <em>amount spent </em><em>is </em><em>less than</em><em> (<)the amount in his pocket</em>, this means that <em>Rashaj can buy 5 boxes of candy. </em>
<em>Learn more here: brainly.com/question/17448505</em>
Answer:
H0: p(1980) = p(2010) ; H1 : P(1980) > P(2010)
0.02
Step-by-step explanation:
Given that:
Sample size in both 1980 and 2010 = 1000 samples :
Proportion in favor :
P(1980) = 0.66
P(2010) = 0.64
To test the hypothesis :
Null hypothesis :
Proportion in favor are the same in both years
Null hypothesis = H0 = p(1980) = p(2010)
Alternative hypothesis :
Proportion in favor in 1980 is greater than that in 2010
Alternative hypothesis = H1 : P(1980) > P(2010)
The sample statistic :
P(1980) - p(2010)
0.66 - 0.64
= 0.02
Answer:
The percentage of the people surveyed that have a cat is 68%
Step-by-step explanation:
we know that
To find the percentage of the people surveyed that have a cat, multiply the given fraction by 100
so
The answer to this question would be: No, they can't
Greatest common factor biggest possible value is the number value itself. There is no factor that bigger than the number.
But the least common multiple smallest possible value is the number. There is no multiple that smaller than the number.
So it is not possible to have GCF bigger than LCM.
5
Step-by-step explanation:
AB=CD (Opposite sides of a parallelogram are equal)
11x-13=42
11x=42+13
11x=55
x=55/11
x=5
