Meselson and Stahl
<u>Explanation:</u>
<u></u>
The classic experiment that supported the semiconservative model of dna replication was performed by Matthew Meselson and Franklin W. Stahl. In this model, the two strands of DNA unwind from each other, and each acts as a template for synthesis of a new, complementary strand. This results in two DNA molecules with one original strand and one new strand. They used E. coli bacteria as a model system.
Considering the definition of kinetic energy, the bullet has a kinetic energy of 156.25 J.
<h3>Kinetic energy</h3>
Kinetic energy is a form of energy. It is defined as the energy associated with bodies that are in motion and this energy depends on the mass and speed of the body.
Kinetic energy is defined as the amount of work necessary to accelerate a body of a given mass and in a rest position, until it reaches a given speed. Once this point is reached, the amount of accumulated kinetic energy will remain the same unless there is a change in speed or the body returns to its rest state by applying a force to it.
The kinetic energy is represented by the following expression:
Ec= ½ mv²
Where:
- Ec is the kinetic energy, which is measured in Joules (J).
- m is the mass measured in kilograms (kg).
- v is the speed measured in meters over seconds (m/s).
<h3>Kinetic energy of a bullet</h3>
In this case, you know:
Replacing in the definition of kinetic energy:
Ec= ½ ×0.500 kg× (25 m/s)²
Solving:
<u><em>Ec= 156.25 J</em></u>
Finally, the bullet has a kinetic energy of 156.25 J.
Learn more about kinetic energy:
brainly.com/question/25959744
brainly.com/question/14028892
#SPJ1
Well according to Newton’s first law of motion, a body will remain in the state of rest or linear motion provided that an *external force* has been applied. So no, a force doesn’t need to keep a body to remain in linear motion, because F=ma, during uniform linear motion velocity is constant, hence acceleration is zero, so F=0
The acceleration is the principal subordinate of the speed if the speed is steady the subsidiary is invalid if the speed is diminishing the subsidiary is negative. When discussing so much stuff we consider the momentary esteem.
<span>Note that when you back off, you back off by and large yet can locally in time quicken a tiny bit, suppose amid 1/tenth of a sec since you achieved a segment of the street which was slanting. In any case, this does not change the way that when the speed diminishes, the quickening is negative.</span>
Yes you can, with using scientific experiment.
Ask a question -- Do background Research -- Construct a Hypothesis --Test with an Experiment -- Procedure working? -- Yes or no? -- Analyze Data and Draw Conclusions
With an experiment you can discover if its correct or not.
Hope this helps ! <3
