Here is the complete question.
Glycerol (C3H8O3), also called glycerine, is widely used in the food and pharmaceutical industries. Glycerol is polar and dissolves readily in water and polar organic solvents like ethanol. Calculate the mole fraction of the solvent in a solution that contains 1.61 g glycerol dissolved in 22.60 mL ethanol (CH3CH2OH; density = 0.7893 g/mol). Round to four significant digits
Answer:
0.9567 mol
Explanation:
Given that:
mass of glycerol = 1.61 g
molar mass of glycerol = 92.1 g/mol
no of mole = 
∴ number of moles of glycerol (
) = 
= 0.0175 mol
Volume of ethanol = 22.60 mL
Density of ethanol = 0.7893 g/mL
Since Density = 
∴ mass of ethanol = density of ethanol × volume of ethanol
mass of ethanol = 0.7893 g/mL × 22.60 mL
mass of ethanol = 17.838 g
Number of moles of ethanol 
= 
= 0.387 mole
∴ the mole fraction of the solvent can be determined as:
= 0.95673671199
≅ 0.9567 mol
∴ The mole fraction of the solvent in a solution that contains 1.61 g glycerol dissolved in 22.60 mL ethanol is = 0.9567 mol
<span>When M(OH)2 dissolves we have
M(OH)2 which produces M2+ and 2OHâ’
pH + pOH=14
At ph =7; we have
7+pOH=14
pOH=14â’7 = 7
Then [OHâ’]=10^(â’pOH)
[OH-] = 10^(-7) = 1* 10^(-7)
At ph = 10. We have,
pOH = 4. And [OH-] = 10^(-4) = 1 * 10^(-4)
Finally ph = 14. We have, pOH = 0
And then [OH-] = 10^(-0) -----anything raised to zero power is 1, but (-0)...
So [OH-] = 1</span>
The reactants are what is put into the reaction equation to get the product. In this case water and ammonia are put into the equation to get the product ammonium hydroxide.
The first choice is the correct answer:
Water and ammonia
Hope this helped!
~Just a girl in love with Shawn Mendes
To know which is a better solvent between the two, one should know what will be the solute. It really depends on what type of solute you have. If the solute is polar then water is the better solvent for that type of solute. However, when the solute is a nonpolar substance then carbon tetrachloride is the better solvent.
The sulphate solutions came from a recycling LIBs waste cathode materials, which were done by previous research; their content is shown in Table 1 [18]. Sodium carbonate (Na2CO3) was purchased from Nihon Shiyaku Reagent, Tokyo, Japan (NaCO3, 99.8%), for the chemical precipitation. CO2 was purchased from Air Product and Chemical, Taipei, Taiwan (CO2 ≥ 99%), to carry out the hydrogenation–decomposition method. Dowex G26 was obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA) and was used as a strong acidic cation exchange resin, to remove impurities. Multi-elements ICP standard solutions were acquired from AccuStandard, New Haven, Connecticut State, USA. The nitric acid (HNO3) and sulfuric acid (H2SO4) were acquired from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA) (HNO3 ≥ 65%) (H2SO4 ≥ 98%) The materials were analyzed by energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS; XFlash6110, Bruker, Billerica, MA, USA), X-ray diffraction (XRD; DX-2700, Dangdong City, Liaoning, China), scanning electron microscopy (SEM; S-3000N, Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan), and inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES; Varian, Vista-MPX, PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA, USA). In order to
Appl. Sci. 2018, 8, 2252 3 of 10
control the hydrogenation temperature and heating rate, a thermostatic bath (XMtd-204;
