Answer: The volume is: " 3.2 mL " .
__________________________________________________
Explanation:
__________________________________________________
"13.2 mL <span>− 10.0 mL = 3.2 mL " .
__________________________________________________
Answer: The volume is: " 3.2 mL " .</span><span>
__________________________________________________</span>
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
The answer is 5 :)
Answer:
hello! although i am not really knowlegeble about this subject, i hope the lengths below can help you solve the problem :)
Step-by-step explanation:
side length: 62.03inches
perimeter: 168.06
area:1276
if this does help you, a brainliest would be appreciated!
<h3>
Answer: Choice B</h3>
No, this is not a plausible value for the population mean, because 5 is not within the 95% confidence interval.
====================================================
Explanation:
The greek letter mu is the population mean. It has the symbol
which looks like the letter 'u' but with a tail at the front or left side.
The question is asking if mu = 5 is plausible if the researcher found the 95% confidence interval to be 5.2 < mu < 7.8
We see that 5 is <u>not</u> in that interval. It's a bit to the left of 5.2
Since mu = 5 is not in the interval, it's not a plausible value for the population mean.
Have we ruled it out with 100% confidence? No. Such a thing is not possible. There's always room for (slight) error. The researcher would need to do a census to be fully confident; however, such practices are very time consuming and expensive. This is the main reason why statistics is important to try to estimate the population with a sample.