The answer is: politicians have a strong incentive to support projects that yield immediate and easily recognized benefits, especially when the costs of the projects are difficult to identify and are observable only in the distant future
In our current political system , politicians have a constant threat of losing their position if they do not show any results to their voter base during the election period.
This means that they are much more likely to support the projects that yield immediate and easily recognized benefits in order to maintain high approval rating and increase their chance of being re-elected.
Sharecropping was a labor system in which one person and their family grew crops for a large landowner. The landowner would allow them to purchase tools, fertilizer, seed, etc... on credit and when the crop was harvested, the sharecropper would receive a "share" of the crop. Often it was not enough to pay off their credit and the cycle began again. Often known as another form of slavery, but 2/3 of sharecroppers were white.
The answer would be true
Explanation: In manhattan city builers were short on land and figured they could build up instead of using more land and building wide horizontally.
The rebelled, boycotted, and stood for their rights as humans
- Jefferson's election<span> confirmed the emergence of a </span>two<span>-party system in American politics. ... </span>Thomas Jefferson<span> called </span>his election<span> "the </span>Revolution of 1800<span>" because it ... Adams and the Federalists had </span>led<span> the nation into an undeclared naval ... In 1802, </span>he<span> acquired the vast </span>territory<span> of</span>Louisiana<span> from France, ...</span>
