Answer:
i would say marginal analysis and scarcity
Explanation:
See scarcity at other answer
Marginal analysis is an examination of the additional benefits of an activity compared to the additional costs incurred by that same activity. Marginal refers to the focus on the cost or benefit of the next unit or individual, for example, the cost to produce one more widget or the profit earned by adding one more worker. Like she chose to have one bucket of water per task she had to do with leftover water, inted of having a bath and using all the water. Like oppertunity cost.
Jays treaty answer: BRITAIN
Pickneys Treaty answer: SPAIN
Answer:
Explanation:
The most logical explanation for Mr Blum pointing out the errors in the current report is to have them corrected.
He is NOT worried about the functionality of your team. because he has complimented you on your past analyses in previous reports. The only issue Mr Blum seems to have is with the current report.
There is also no information here to indicate that Mr Blum thinks that you are ready for a promotion.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although there are no options provided, we can comment on the following.
Sports experiences can vary depending on whether a person is playing in a power and performance sport as opposed to a pleasure and participation sport.
When the individual is playing in a power or performance sport, the person's attitude is totally different because it is competing. It has a competitive mind that is aimed to win or perform at ist best to get the trophy, the medal, the playoffs. Its effort and performance is the result of committed preparation and a correct strategy to defeat the opponent.
On the other hand, when you play just to participate, you are playing for fun, to have a good time and do some exercise. Your mind is not competing so you have a more relaxed attitude and winning or losing are out of the question.
Answer:
In the first past the post system, as the name implies, the party or candidate winning the a plurality of votes obtains all the political seats being contested.
For example, suppose we have three parties, and 20 seats being contested in a fictional election. The results are:
Red party - 60%
Green party - 30%
Blue party - 10%
Under a first past the post system, the Red Party would obtain all the 20 seats.
Under a proportional system, on the other hand, each party or candidate gets a proportional amount of seats corresponding to the percentage of the votes.
For example, if the number of seats contested is 20, and we obtain the same results as above, the number of seats for each party (in bold) would be:
Red party - 60% - 12 seats
Green party - 30% - 6 seats
Blue party - 10% - 2 seats
