Answer:
a) 
b) 
c) 
d) 
or 18.3 cm
Explanation:
For this case we have the following system with the forces on the figure attached.
We know that the spring compresses a total distance of x=0.10 m
Part a
The gravitational force is defined as mg so on this case the work donde by the gravity is:
Part b
For this case first we can convert the spring constant to N/m like this:
And the work donde by the spring on this case is given by:
Part c
We can assume that the initial velocity for the block is Vi and is at rest from the end of the movement. If we use balance of energy we got:
And if we solve for the initial velocity we got:
Part d
Let d1 represent the new maximum distance, in order to find it we know that :
And replacing we got:
And we can put the terms like this:
If we multiply all the equation by 2 we got:
Now we can replace the values and we got:
And solving the quadratic equation we got that the solution for or 18.3 cm because the negative solution not make sense.
Answer:
Replacement-Level Fertility
Another important population characteristic that differ btw develop nation and developing nations is relates to births is replacement-level fertility. Replacement-level fertility is the fertility rate that will result in the replacement of the parents in the population. Again, in an ideal world, the human replacement-level fertility rate would be exactly two. This would mean that each couple would produce two offspring that would replace them in the population. If this occurred, then the human population would stay at a stable rate
<span><em>The answer is </em><em>A</em><em> :</em><em>" R = (First digit * 10 + second digit) * multiplier. "
</em><em>yw peasant XD</em><em>
</em></span>
Answer:
Change in electric potential energy ∆E = 365.72 kJ
Explanation:
Electric potential energy can be defined mathematically as:
E = kq1q2/r ....1
k = coulomb's constant = 9.0×10^9 N m^2/C^2
q1 = charge 1 = -2.1C
q2 = charge 2 = -5.0C
∆r = change in distance between the charges
r1 = 420km = 420000m
r2 = 160km = 160000m
From equation 1
∆E = kq1q2 (1/r2 -1/r1) ......2
Substituting the given values
∆E = 9.0×10^9 × -2.1 ×-5.0(1/160000 - 1/420000)
∆E = 94.5 × 10^9 (3.87 × 10^-6) J
∆E = 365.72 × 10^3 J
∆E = 365.72 kJ
It is indeed true that scientists have known about the background radiation (commonly known as the Cosmic Microwave Background) since the early 60s. It was first discovered quite by accident by Penzias and Wilson working at Bell Labs, who detected it as an unexplainable interference in their precision radio equipment. When people finally figured out exactly what it was they were seeing, they won the Nobel Prize for their discovery. Only a few years before, George Gamow had predicted that if the Big Bang theory were correct, we should observe just such a background radiation. The CMB is not the only evidence in favor of the Big Bang, but it is one of the most important. It is a natural consequence of the theory, and is pretty unexplainable in steady-state cosmology.
The 15-20 billion year number comes not from the CMB, but rather predominantly from measurements of nearby and distant galaxies, particularly their rates of expansion away from us. We find that the distance to a galaxy is proportional to its recessional velocity. The constant of proportionality is the Hubble Constant, H, which turns out to be (approximately) the reciprocal of the age of the universe. So we measure the age by measuring recessional velocities. T = 1/H is only true, however, if the universe is not significantly accelerating or decelerating its expansion rate. If the rate of expansion is rapidly accelerating, the universe may be older than 1/H = 15 billion years, give or take. Such an acceleration would be caused by a large value of the Cosmological Constant, a sort of anti-gravity force predicted by General Relativity. There is some evidence that this might be the case.
So finally, yes, the age of the universe, being based on the empirical determination of H, is based on the observed evidence.
