The ""trolley problem"" is an exercise in ethical decision-making. The principles laid out in the trolley problem does not provide a mandated approach to business ethics. So the answer is False.
What is Trolley Problem?
The trolley problem is a collection of ethical and psychological thought experiments that simulate ethical decisions on whether to sacrifice one person in order to save more people. A runaway tram or trolley is on course to hit and kill a number of people (often five) down the track, but a driver or bystander can intervene and reroute the vehicle to kill just one person on a different track. This is how most episodes of the series start. Then, similar life-and-death situations (medical, legal, etc.) and other variations of the runaway car are presented. In each case, there is a choice between doing nothing, in which case several people will perish, and intervening and sacrificing one originally "safe" person to save the others.
To learn more about Trolly Problem
brainly.com/question/25661433
#SPJ4
Answer:
I partially support the given statement – "Given the real factors of the present economy and the fast changes happening in business innovation, every single upper hand are fleeting. There is nothing of the sort as a reasonable upper hand that keeps going over the long haul." I differ in part on economical upper hand.
In a unique world, organizations need to receive a powerful system to keep up an upper hand in the worldwide market. Change is the main steady in the globalized business world. To get a reasonable bit of leeway, organizations need to incorporate development with their association's structure and steady advancement one alternative gives a practical upper hand. In a computerized world, interruption is happing in territories, for example, item development, supply chains, and large information. Kodak is the traditional model and was the pioneer of photography till as of late and had an upper hand. What's more, Nokia was the main maker of cell phones and unexpectedly vanished from the market. Every one of these organizations had great key arranging and had a not too bad upper hand in the commercial center. The explanation behind unexpected fall is they can't foresee the innovation interruptions in their center zones. To continue the business in this day and age, we have to foresee innovation pattern and need interests in the potential advances. Notwithstanding innovation speculations, the organization needs to support developments inside the association through connecting with the workers in steady procedure upgrades. Associations structure, impetus conspire, building administration, constant learning and adaptable working conditions are going to assume significant job in making reasonable upper hand.
Here is the answer that would best complete the given statement above. The "Right-to-Know" law requires your employer to have a written hazardous communication (HAZCOM) program including I<span>nformation about chemicals in their workplaces. </span><span>Private-sector employers must provide chemical information to their workers under the OSHA standard. This is to ensure that containers are labeled and the employees are are properly informed and trained.</span>
Mandatory spending is something that either has, or is strongly urged to be done. Discretionary spending is based on the spenders discretion, if the spender thinks it needs to be spent, then they would do so. Example of mandatory spending would be paying back a loan. Example of discretionary spending would be a good business investment. Hope this helps!
