Answer:
<em>(C). b + (2 × 35) = 180; b = 110°</em>
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
Top left.
Step-by-step explanation:
Fold the three squares together, then each triangle up.
Step-by-step explanation:
<u>Step 1: Find the correct option</u>
If you look at the attached photo, the option that fits those points is option B, therefore, the correct answer is B
Answer: Option B
<em>Look at the attachment:</em>
Answer:
add 1 hundred because you put a 1 instead of a 2
but the answer is 5 tens
There are two of them.
I don't know a mechanical way to 'solve' for them.
One can be found by trial and error:
x=0 . . . . . 2^0 = 1 . . . . . 4(0) = 0 . . . . . no, that doesn't work
x=1 . . . . . 2^1 = 2 . . . . . 4(1) = 4 . . . . . no, that doesn't work
x=2 . . . . . 2^2 = 4 . . . . . 4(2) = 8 . . . . . no, that doesn't work
x=3 . . . . . 2^3 = 8 . . . . . 4(3) = 12 . . . . no, that doesn't work
<em>x=4</em> . . . . . 2^4 = <em><u>16</u></em> . . . . 4(4) = <em><u>16</u></em> . . . . Yes ! That works ! yay !
For the other one, I constructed tables of values for 2^x and (4x)
in a spread sheet, then graphed them, and looked for the point
where the graphs of the two expressions cross.
The point is near, but not exactly, <em>x = 0.30990693...
</em>If there's a way to find an analytical expression for the value, it must involve
some esoteric kind of math operations that I didn't learn in high school or
engineering school, and which has thus far eluded me during my lengthy
residency in the college of hard knocks.<em> </em> If anybody out there has it, I'm
waiting with all ears.<em>
</em>
