It was during the Han dynasty (206 BCE-220 CE) when Confucianism became the prevalent political ideology, thus Han dynasty reflect confucian values in its core structure and social order.
Confucianism was part of the Chinese social fabric and way of life; to Confucians, everyday life was the arena of religion, thus there was no separation between state, culture and religion.
Confucianism became a partner with the autocratic Legalist state structures, thus the nature of the leaders and government was profoundly affected by Confucian values, which revolves almost entirely around issues related to the family, morals, and the role of the good ruler.
Step one of the z model corresponds to the thinking cognitive style
Judicial Review is the Court's Examination of the Constitutionality of the actions of Congress and the President (and the court's right to nullify what the other branches of government have done if they find it unconstitutional). This process was first established by the Marbury v. Madison Supreme Court Case.
Answer: A. designating an anti-charity should be more effective because loss aversion will provide additional motivation
.
Options:
A. designating an anti-charity should be more effective because loss
aversion will provide additional motivation
B. designating a charity should be more effective because it avoids all potential for loss
C. it shouldn’t matter whether one designates a charity or anti-charity
D. self-interest biases generally keep people from choosing the anti-charity
Explanation:
The study of behavioral Economics shows that people are more driven by the loss of fear than the hope of gain. This is known as loss aversion. In commitment contracts where penalty money is promised to a charity or an anti-charity if the goal is not achieved, those who promise their money to an anti-charity tend to achieve their goals more. The same also applies when comparing this group and those who do not have to forego anything if they do not meet their target.
This is because giving to a charity will still seem beneficial while losing the money to an anti-charity will seem like a total loss.