Answer:
Results
We systematically analyze and compare how different modelling methodologies can be used to describe translation. We define various statistically equivalent codon-based simulation algorithms and analyze the importance of the update rule in determining the steady state, an aspect often neglected. Then a novel probabilistic Boolean network (PBN) model is proposed for modelling translation, which enjoys an exact numerical solution. This solution matches those of numerical simulation from other methods and acts as a complementary tool to analytical approximations and simulations. The advantages and limitations of various codon-based models are compared, and illustrated by examples with real biological complexities such as slow codons, premature termination and feedback regulation. Our studies reveal that while different models gives broadly similiar trends in many cases, important differences also arise and can be clearly seen, in the dependence of the translation rate on different parameters. Furthermore, the update rule affects the steady state solution.
Conclusions
The codon-based models are based on different levels of abstraction. Our analysis suggests that a multiple model approach to understanding translation allows one to ascertain which aspects of the conclusions are robust with respect to the choice of modelling methodology, and when (and why) important differences may arise. This approach also allows for an optimal use of analysis tools, which is especially important when additional complexities or regulatory mechanisms are included. This approach can provide a robust platform for dissecting translation, and results in an improved predictive framework for applications in systems and synthetic biology.
hope it help friends
The answer is “B” because the blowing through the straw would be like the wind
Answer:
The most appropriate way of sharing the results is to publish in a scientific journal for peer review. So the answer is 'B'.
Explanation:
In order to validate your results in the scientific community, it is best to publish in a <em>scientific journal</em> and get it peer reviewed. When the article is peer reviewed, other scientists of <em>higher caliber</em> verify your experiment and results and then give their verdict to the outside world.
Newspapers sometimes also <em>publish rumors</em>. So there is no guarantee what gets published is true. the students are still learning and cannot appreciate the full extent of your work.
