Answer:
Third
Step-by-step explanation:
First would be, simplified, 2x+10=2x-10
Second, simplified, -2x-10=2x-10
Third, simplified, -2x-10=-2x-10
Fourth, simplified, -2x+10=2x-10
So it's third :)
hope this helps :D
(a) Using the table, give the values fo rthe inverse
1) original table of values:
x 1 2 3 4 5
f(x) 0 1 1 5 3
2) The inverse of the function is obtained by exchanging x and f(x), this is:
( x, f(x) ) → ( f(x), x)
3) So, the table of values of the inverse of the given function is:
x 0 1 1 5 3
f⁻¹ (x) 0 1 2 3 4
(b) Is the inverse a function?
No, the inverse is not a function, since the table of the inverse shows that the x -value 1 has two different images.
This ambigüity is opposite to the definition of a function, which requires that any input value has only one output. For that reason, the inverse is not a function. You cannot tell whether the image of 1 is 1 or 2, because both are images of the same value.
the answe would be (0,0) because its the midel witch is also the origin
Answer:
Yes, 4 + -4 = 0.
Think of it like a number line: The number four is 4 units to the right of the center which is 0, and the number negative four is 4 units to the left of the center. When you add them together, those distances cancel out, and you just get 0.
Answer:
21,000
Step-by-step explanation:
This is more of straightforward multiplication, so I cannot explain much! If you want me to try to do more, then just comment.
(7 * 10 * 5) * (3 * 10 * 2)
= (70 * 5) * (30 * 2)
= (350) * (60)
= 21,000
Thusly, in standard form, the equation given is 
.
Hope this helps! (:
