Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
x-intercept → Plug in 0 for <em>y</em><em> </em>to get −3 for <em>x</em>
y-intercept → When <em>x</em><em> </em>is set equal to 0 [(0, −6)]
I am joyous to assist you anytime.
Answer:
She spent 5 hours mowing lawns.
Step-by-step explanation:
To solve, we will just use some algebra
8h + 20 = 60 | Subtract 20 from both sides
8h = 40 | Divide both sides by 8
h = 5
We can confirm this by plugging it back into the original formula.
8(5) + 20 = 60
40 + 20 = 60
60 = 60
Answer:
False
Step-by-step explanation:
There are two concepts:
1. Row Echelon Form: There can be more than two <em>row echelon forms</em> of a single matrix, so different sequences of row operations can lead to different <em>row echelon forms</em> of a single matrix.
2. Reduced Row Echelon Form: It's unique for each matrix, so different sequences of row operations always lead to the same <em>reduced row echelon form</em> for the same matrix.
X equal to 6 plus 1 by 3 which is 19 by 3 is the answer which is also a improper fraction
