Answer: seven and twenty-five hundredths
Step-by-step explanation:
just need to know how to say it
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
To solve this problem we need to write the mixed fraction as a fractional number, as follows:
Then, evaluating the expression:
×
= 
→
Answer:
For the reasons mentioned in the explanation section, it is indeed a weak generalization:
Step-by-step explanation:
- No, there is not enough data provided on certain subjects' age, socioeconomic status, etc. that may have influenced the investing decision.
- No, the survey isn't random, the study is irregular because each has a fair probability of expressing their true beliefs, here in this query it's written they've been told individuals are given actual medication, which may have contributed to the Hawthorne studies giving incorrect outcomes.
- No, the amount isn't sufficient mostly on the premise of 28 subject areas with be provided oxytocin, and therefore only one test being performed should we not be able to determine the results to implement for certain persons including billions of populace, it would be a hurried generalization.
Answer:
2.5% ?
Step-by-step explanation:
.025 as percentage is 2.5%
Answer:
answer is not
Step-by-step explanation:
clear sorry
