Globalization in essence is companies and governments climbing onto the world stage and interacting internationally.
Globalization has helped some, but it has also hurt a lot, specifically through:
- Making the rich richer
- Removing trade barriers only for new ones to rise (VAT taxes, etc.)
- Increased trade deficits with many jobs leaving their developed nations for less developed ones (U.S. manufacturing to China, etc.)
- Developed country job pay cuts
- MNC's leaving countries and exploiting international tax havens
- MNC's overseeing bad work conditions in countries with less regulations
- MNC's influencing international politics
- Exploitation of labor
- Social welfare schemes
Et cetera, et cetera...
All the problems we hear about with companies leaving their countries and stranding thousands if not millions of people without jobs, and labor issues in other countries all stem from globalization. So we need to decide if the benefits outweigh the costs here or not...
Answer: Tasha's motivation to become active reflects her <u>D.moral sensibility.</u>
Explanation:
Moral sensibility refers to one's perceptions of the moral issues within a particular subject, philosophy, political movement, etc. In other words, moral sensibility means that someone is sensitive to their responsibilities towards what is happening around them. Tasha's sensitivity towards animals is reflected in her active participation in demonstrations against killing animals.
Sitting in your assigned seat in school is an example of a social-conventional rule. Social-conventional rules are agreed upon by society and may take the form of a custom. Sitting in your assigned seat at school is considered a social-conventional rule because children are expected to listen to their teachers at school. This is a socially agreed upon rule.
<span>is not a practical option</span>
