1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
iVinArrow [24]
2 years ago
14

Question 7

Physics
2 answers:
Drupady [299]2 years ago
6 0
Power = energy/time=20/4=5.0
Dima020 [189]2 years ago
5 0

Answer:

the answer is B or 5 watts of power

You might be interested in
The intensity of a sound wave at a fixed distance from a speaker vibrating at 1.00 kHz is 0.750 W/m2. (a) Determine the intensit
sveticcg [70]

Answer:

a)   I = 3.63 W / m² , b)   I = 0.750 W / m²

Explanation:

The intensity of a sound wave is given by the relation

         I = P / A = ½ ρ v (2π f s_{max})²

         I = (½ ρ v 4π² s_{max}²) f²

a) with the initial condition let's call the intensity Io

        cte = (½ ρ v 4π² s_{max}²)

         I₀ = cte s² f₀²

        I₀ = cte 10 6

If frequency is increase f = 2.20 10³ Hz

         I = constant (2.20 10³) 2

         I = cte 4.84 10⁶

let's find the relationship of the two quantities

        I / Io = 4.84

        I = 4.84 Io

        I = 4.84 0.750

        I = 3.63 W / m²

b) in this case the frequency is reduced to f = 0.250 10³ Hz and the displacement s = 4 s or

        I = cte (f s)²

        I = constant (0.250 10³ 4)²

 

        I = cte 1 10⁶

         

the relationship

        I / Io = 1

        I = Io

        I = 0.750 W / m²

6 0
2 years ago
To stretch a certain nonlinear spring by an amount x requires a force F given by F = 40 x − 6 x 2 , where F is in Newtons and x
strojnjashka [21]

Answer:

64 J

Explanation:

The potential energy change of the spring ∆U = -W where W = work done by force, F.

Now W = ∫F.dx

So, ∆U = - ∫F.dx = - ∫Fdxcos180 (since the spring force and extension are in opposite directions)

∆U = - ∫-Fdx

=  ∫F.dx

Since F = 40x - 6x² and x moves from x = 0 to x = 2 m, we integrate thus, ∆U =  ∫₀²F.dx

=  ∫₀²(40x - 6x²).dx

=  ∫₀²(40xdx - 6x²dx)

=  ∫₀²(40x²/2 - 6x³/3)

=  ∫₀²(20x² - 2x³)

= [20x² - 2x³]₀²

= [(20(2)² - 2(2)³) - (20(0)² - 2(0)³)

= [(20(4) - 2(8)) - (0 - 0))

= [80 - 16 - 0]

= 64 J

5 0
3 years ago
Which of the following statement is not true about machines?
viva [34]
The answer to this question is D or the last one 

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why is pseudoscience bad?
USPshnik [31]

Answer:

It is quite difficult to picture a pseudoscientist—really picture him or her over the course of a day, a year, or a whole career. What kind or research does he or she actually do, what differentiates him or her from a carpenter, or a historian, or a working scientist? In short, what do such people think they are up to?

… it is a significant point for reflection that all individuals who have been called “pseudoscientists” have considered themselves to be “scientists”, with no prefix.

The answer might surprise you. When they find time after the obligation of supporting themselves, they read papers in specific areas, propose theories, gather data, write articles, and, maybe, publish them. What they imagine they are doing is, in a word, “science”. They might be wrong about that—many of us hold incorrect judgments about the true nature of our activities—but surely it is a significant point for reflection that all individuals who have been called “pseudoscientists” have considered themselves to be “scientists”, with no prefix.

What is pseudoscience?

“Pseudoscience” is a bad category for analysis. It exists entirely as a negative attribution that scientists and non‐scientists hurl at others but never apply to themselves. Not only do they apply the term exclusively as a discrediting slur, they do so inconsistently. Over the past two‐and‐a‐quarter centuries since the term popped into the Western European languages, a great number of disparate doctrines have been categorized as sharing a core quality—pseudoscientificity, if you will—when in fact they do not. It is based on this diversity that I refer to such beliefs and theories as “fringe” rather than as “pseudo”: Their defining characteristic is the distance from the center of the mainstream scientific consensus in whichever direction, not some essential property they share.

Scholars have by and large tended to ignore fringe science as regrettable sideshows to the main narrative of the history of science, but there is a good deal to be learned by applying the same tools of analysis that have been used to understand mainstream science. This is not, I stress, to imply that there is no difference between hollow‐Earth theories and geophysics; on the contrary, the differences are the point of the analysis. Focusing on the historical and conceptual relationship between the fringe and the core of the various sciences as that blurry border has fluctuated over the centuries provides powerful analytical leverage for understanding where contemporary anti‐science movements come from and how mainstream scientists might address them.

As soon as professionalization blossomed, tagging competing theories as pseudoscientific became an important tool for scientists to define what they understood science to be

The central claim of this essay is that the concept of “pseudoscience” was called into being as the shadow of professional science. Before science became a profession—with formalized training, credentialing, publishing venues, careers—the category of pseudoscience did not exist. As soon as professionalization blossomed, tagging competing theories as pseudoscientific became an important tool for scientists to define what they understood science to be. In fact, despite many decades of strenuous effort by philosophers and historians, a precise definition of “science” remains elusive. It should be noted however that the absence of such definitional clarity has not seriously inhibited the ability of scientists to deepen our understanding of nature tremendously.

Explanation:

8 0
2 years ago
When two or more different capacitors are connected in series across a potential source, which of the following statement must b
vova2212 [387]

Answer:

C. Each capacitor carries the same amount of charge.

Explanation:

When two or more different capacitors are connected in series across a potential source, each capacitor carries the same amount of charge.

In a series connected capacitor, sane amount of charge flows through the capacitors while different potential difference is passed across them.

The capacitors have the same charge as the charge flowing out directly from the potential source called emf since the emf is the driving force of charge in a circuit.

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Feng and Isaac are riding on a merry-go- round. Feng rides on a horse at the outer rim of the circular platform, twice as far fr
    14·1 answer
  • Air is compressed from 14.7 psia and 60°F to a pressure of 150 psia while being cooled at a rate of 10 Btu/lbm by circulating wa
    11·1 answer
  • I need help with this question ASAP
    9·1 answer
  • Help?? Pictures for each state
    10·1 answer
  • Which of the following describes what will happen when one lowers the kinetic energy of the particles in a sample of matter?
    5·1 answer
  • Which of the following represents an image that is located behind a mirror?
    11·2 answers
  • A trip is taken that passes through the following points in order
    10·1 answer
  • Consider a car moving at a constant velocity. Recall that, for any object to move at a constant velocity, the net force acting o
    13·2 answers
  • A box is at rest on a slope
    11·1 answer
  • compare and contrast the excited state and the ground state of electrons. please use proper grammar and mechanics.
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!