In the process of straight rebuys, the buyer has this tendency to be the only member of the buying centre that is involved in the operation. In addition to that, the method is also used to describe the when a consumer would have to buy again the same product without referring to the information attached to it.
Answer:
Answer for the question:
Joe Runyan is the owner of a dry-cleaning company in Kansas City called Hangers. They specialize in eco-friendly dry-cleaning, friendly off-beat customer service with strong ties to the local community, and at-home pickup and drop-off services. In 2009, Proctor and Gamble opened a storefront in Kansas City that also uses eco-friendly materials, has a drive-through for pickup and drop-off, and offers slightly cheaper services. Hangers’ Strategy by the Numbers 2009: 10 storefronts, 6 vans, 35 employees, 0 community outreach events, $0 spent on community 2010: 10 storefronts, 6 vans, 35 employees, 0 community outreach events, $0 spent on community 2011: 5 storefronts, 10 vans, 35 employees, 4 community outreach events, $20,000 spent in contributions to local schools 2012: 4 storefronts, 11 vans, 35 employees, 4 community outreach events, $25,000 spent in contributions to local schools.
Constructing a central message.
is given in the attachment.
Explanation:
I’m pro choice but respect everyone’s opinion:)
Answer: predatory pricing
Explanation: In simple words, it refers to a pricing strategy in which the organisation price its goods very low with the objective of capturing the whole market and forcing to leave the other competitors.
In the given case, Lofonitt captured the mp3 market by offering lower price [products leading to failure of their competitors.
Hence we can conclude that they were indulged in predatory pricing.
Answer:
A) change in the cost of eating index = <u>20% increase</u>
B) Suppose that consumers are completely indifferent between two chickens and one ham. For this example, how large is the substitution bias in the official "cost-of-eating" index?
The <u>INCREASE</u> in the cost-of-eating index is <u>18</u> %.
The <u>OVERESTIMATE</u> of inflation in the cost of eating reflects substitution bias.
Explanation:
2015
product units unit cost total
chickens 30 $4 $120
hams 10 $5 $50
<u>steaks 10 $8 $80</u>
total $250
2016
product units unit cost total
chickens 30 $5 $150
hams 10 $7 $70
<u>steaks 10 $8 $80</u>
total $300
A) ($300 - $250) / $250 = 20%
B)
if consumers are indifferent for 2 chickens per 1 ham, then the new basket should be assuming consumers will purchase the cheapest option:
2016
product units unit cost total
hams 25 $7 $175
<u>steaks 10 $8 $80</u>
total $255
the increase in inflation would have been = ($255 - $250) / $250 = 2%
the substitution bias = reported inflation - real inflation = 20% - 2% = 18%
