Answer: C. -3y+14
Step-by-step explanation:
Move 3y to ther right side.
So the answer is C. Because x = -3y+14.
Ok, so what you want to do, is to start by adding the values together. So, she read an average of 36 pages for the first three days. So, you will multiply 36 by 3. Then, you will have 44 pages for the next three days, or 44 * 3. And finally, you have the last 10 pages. So, it is (36 * 3) + (44*3) + 10. So, 36 times 3 is 108, and 44 times 3 is 132. So, you now have 108 + 132 + 10. Add all of those values together, and your final answer is
250.
Answer:
present value = $16750
Step-by-step explanation:
The simple interest formula allows us to calculate A, which is the final amount. According to this formula, the amount is given by A = P (1 + r*t), where P is the principal, r is the annual interest rate in decimal form, and t is the loan period expressed in years
simple interest formula:
t: time
P: present value
A: amount
r
: anual interest
A = P (1 + r*t)
P = A / (1 + r*t)
P = 19,513.75 / (1 + 3/100 * 5.5)
P = 19,513.75/ (1 + 0.165)
P = 19,513.75 / 1.165
P = 16750
present value = $16750
Reliable causal inference based on observational studies is seriously threatened by unmeasured confounding.
What is unmeasured cofounding?
- By definition, an unmeasured confounder is a variable that is connected to both the exposed and the result and could explain the apparent observed link.
- The validity of interpretation in observational studies is threatened by unmeasured confounding. The use of negative control group to reduce unmeasured confounding has grown in acceptance and popularity in recent years.
Although they've been utilised mostly for bias detection, negative controls have a long history in laboratory sciences and epidemiology of ruling out non-causal causes. A pair of negative control exposure and outcome variables can be utilised to non-parametrically determine the average treatment effect (ATE) from observational data that is vulnerable to uncontrolled confounding, according to a recent study by Miao and colleagues.
Reliable causal inference based on observational studies is seriously threatened by unmeasured confounding.
Learn more about unmeasured confounding here:
brainly.com/question/10863424
#SPJ4
The answer is 489,300.
Work:
We go to the tenth's place, which is 9. Since 9 is higher than 5, we need to round the hundredth's place to 3.
