If that statement were true, then you would never have any reason to eat.
It might taste good for a while, but it would never help you stand up and
move around.
Where WOULD you get the energy to stand up and walk, if it didn't
come from food ? ?
The whole idea is pretty absurd. I guess the statement is not true.
Answer:
The slower the intended velocity, the closer the force expressed comes to equalling the linear inertia of the load (i.e. the amount of force needed to hold the weight motionless). From Equation 1, force is inversely proportional to time
It depends.<span>Ptolemy was one of the most famous astronomers who was convinced that or solar system was geocentric, or revolving around the earth. Then, Copernicus came around, along with Galileo, and the attempted to convince people that that wasn't true, but that we were revolving around the sun. In fact, if you're writing an essay, a good point to add would be that Galileo spent a large part of his life imprisoned for "disobedience of the (Roman) Gods.)"</span>
The chloroplast of the cell is most likely damaged if the plant cell is no longer capable of capturing energy from sunlight and converting it into chemical energy.
The chloroplast is the structure inside the leaf cell that is known for capturing light energy from the sun.
This light energy is then used to make food that has chemical energy. If a plant cell has a damaged chloroplast or the chloroplast is removed, then it will no longer be able to trap the light energy. As a result, the process of photosynthesis will not occur in the plant cell. The plant cell will not be able to make the chemical energy required for functioning.
To learn more about chloroplast, click here:
brainly.com/question/1741612
#SPJ4
Answer: See below
Explanation:
Therefore, both cars move with a velocity of 18.099 m/s in the direction of 15.945° downward from the x-axis (east)
