Answer:
6 2/3.. i think
Step-by-step explanation:
hopefully u understand my messy handwriting
Answer:
430 minutes total
Step-by-step explanation:
Mo had 35 minutes sessions 14 times. You have to multiply 35 by 14 to get the answer which is 430 minutes.
Answer:
Note: The full question is attached as picture below
a) Hо : p = 0.71
Ha : p ≠ 0.71
<em>p </em>= x / n
<em>p </em>= 91/110
<em>p </em>= 0.83.
1 - Pо = 1 - 0.71 = 0.29.
b) Test statistic = z
= <em>p </em>- Pо / [√Pо * (1 - Pо ) / n]
= 0.83 - 0.71 / [√(0.71 * 0.29) / 110]
= 0.12 / 0.043265
= 2.77360453
Test statistic = 2.77
c) P-value
P(z > 2.77) = 2 * [1 - P(z < 2.77)] = 2 * 0.0028
P-value = 0.0056
∝ = 0.01
P-value < ∝
Reject the null hypothesis. There is sufficient evidence to support the researchers claim at the 1% significance level.
Radius, r = 3
The equation of a sphere entered at the origin in cartesian coordinates is
x^2 + y^2 + z^2 = r^2
That in spherical coordinates is:
x = rcos(theta)*sin(phi)
y= r sin(theta)*sin(phi)
z = rcos(phi)
where you can make u = r cos(phi) to obtain the parametrical equations
x = √[r^2 - u^2] cos(theta)
y = √[r^2 - u^2] sin (theta)
z = u
where theta goes from 0 to 2π and u goes from -r to r.
In our case r = 3, so the parametrical equations are:
Answer:
x = √[9 - u^2] cos(theta)
y = √[9 - u^2] sin (theta)
z = u
N=0
Done !!!!!!!! Can I get brainliest
