1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Aleksandr-060686 [28]
3 years ago
9

Who has greater displacement, an astronaut who has just completed an orbit of the earth or you when you have just traveled from

home to school?
Physics
1 answer:
Arte-miy333 [17]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

Explanation:

This is going to sound like an absurd answer, but sometimes physics can be a little strange.

This answer is weird because of the definition of displacement. It means the distance from the starting point to the ending point, disregarding what happened in between. The point is that the astronaut is at the starting point of his orbit. By definition the starting and ending points are the same. His displacement is 0.

So the answer is you have the greater displacement when you walked one way to school.  The starting point and the ending point are different. You have gone further.

However just to make things a little nasty, when you walk home again, your displacement will be the same as the astronaut's -- 0 meters because you will be right back where you started from.

You might be interested in
A projectile of mass m is launched with an initial velocity vector v i making an angle θ with the horizontal as shown below. The
sergeinik [125]
Angular momentum is given by the length of the arm to the object, multiplied by the momentum of the object, times the cosine of the angle that the momentum vector makes with the arm. From your illustration, that will be: 
<span>L = R * m * vi * cos(90 - theta) </span>

<span>cos(90 - theta) is just sin(theta) </span>
<span>and R is the distance the projectile traveled, which is vi^2 * sin(2*theta) / g </span>

<span>so, we have: L = vi^2 * sin(2*theta) * m * vi * sin(theta) / g </span>

<span>We can combine the two vi terms and get: </span>

<span>L = vi^3 * m * sin(theta) * sin(2*theta) / g </span>

<span>What's interesting is that angular momentum varies with the *cube* of the initial velocity. This is because, not only does increased velocity increase the translational momentum of the projectile, but it increase the *moment arm*, too. Also note that there might be a trig identity which lets you combine the two sin() terms, but nothing jumps out at me right at the moment. </span>

<span>Now, for the first part... </span>

<span>There are a few ways to attack this. Basically, you have to find the angle from the origin to the apogee (highest point) in the arc. Once we have that, we'll know what angle the momentum vector makes with the moment-arm because, at the apogee, we know that all of the motion is *horizontal*. </span>

<span>Okay, so let's get back to what we know: </span>

<span>L = d * m * v * cos(phi) </span>

<span>where d is the distance (length to the arm), m is mass, v is velocity, and phi is the angle the velocity vector makes with the arm. Let's take these one by one... </span>

<span>m is still m. </span>
<span>v is going to be the *hoizontal* component of the initial velocity (all the vertical component got eliminated by the acceleration of gravity). So, v = vi * cos(theta) </span>
<span>d is going to be half of our distance R in part two (because, ignoring friction, the path of the projectile is a perfect parabola). So, d = vi^2 * sin(2*theta) / 2g </span>

<span>That leaves us with phi, the angle the horizontal velocity vector makes with the moment arm. To find *that*, we need to know what the angle from the origin to the apogee is. We can find *that* by taking the arc-tangent of the slope, if we know that. Well, we know the "run" part of the slope (it's our "d" term), but not the rise. </span>

<span>The easy way to get the rise is by using conservation of energy. At the apogee, all of the *vertical* kinetic energy at the time of launch (1/2 * m * (vi * sin(theta))^2 ) has been turned into gravitational potential energy ( m * g * h ). Setting these equal, diving out the "m" and dividing "g" to the other side, we get: </span>

<span>h = 1/2 * (vi * sin(theta))^2 / g </span>

<span>So, there's the rise. So, our *slope* is rise/run, so </span>

<span>slope = [ 1/2 * (vi * sin(theta))^2 / g ] / [ vi^2 * sin(2*theta) / g ] </span>

<span>The "g"s cancel. Astoundingly the "vi"s cancel, too. So, we get: </span>

<span>slope = [ 1/2 * sin(theta)^2 ] / [ sin(2*theta) ] </span>

<span>(It's not too alarming that slope-at-apogee doesn't depend upon vi, since that only determines the "magnitude" of the arc, but not it's shape. Whether the overall flight of this thing is an inch or a mile, the arc "looks" the same). </span>

<span>Okay, so... using our double-angle trig identities, we know that sin(2*theta) = 2*sin(theta)*cos(theta), so... </span>

<span>slope = [ 1/2 * sin(theta)^2 ] / [ 2*sin(theta)*cos(theta) ] = tan(theta)/4 </span>

<span>Okay, so the *angle* (which I'll call "alpha") that this slope makes with the x-axis is just: arctan(slope), so... </span>

<span>alpha = arctan( tan(theta) / 4 ) </span>

<span>Alright... last bit. We need "phi", the angle the (now-horizontal) momentum vector makes with that slope. Draw it on paper and you'll see that phi = 180 - alpha </span>

<span>so, phi = 180 - arctan( tan(theta) / 4 ) </span>

<span>Now, we go back to our original formula and plug it ALL in... </span>

<span>L = d * m * v * cos(phi) </span>

<span>becomes... </span>

<span>L = [ vi^2 * sin(2*theta) / 2g ] * m * [ vi * cos(theta) ] * [ cos( 180 - arctan( tan(theta) / 4 ) ) ] </span>

<span>Now, cos(180 - something) = cos(something), so we can simplify a little bit... </span>

<span>L = [ vi^2 * sin(2*theta) / 2g ] * m * [ vi * cos(theta) ] * [ cos( arctan( tan(theta) / 4 ) ) ] </span>
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of the following must be true about the object labeled X in the circuit below?
Alex787 [66]

the answer is c and if I help you  thank me
4 0
3 years ago
What is the average velocity of the object from t=1s to t= 3 s?
galina1969 [7]

Answer:

Explanation:

Since this is a distance v time graph, the slope of the line from 1s to 3s is the velocity. However, it looks like, at t=3, the velocity is 0, so getting the definite velocity is not going to happen. We can estimate it as closely as possible. Since the line is tending from the upper left to the lower right, the slope is negative, so the velocity is also negative. That leaves only C or D as our answers. And the slope is closer to -1 than to -5, so choice D. is the one you want.

7 0
3 years ago
What types of elements are useful for dating materials?
Semenov [28]
Well im not sure if this is the correct dating materials but here are some examples of Fundamentals of radiometric dating<span>Radioactive decay.
Accuracy of radiometric dating.
Closure temperature.
The age equation.
Uranium–lead dating method.
Samarium–neodymium dating method.
Potassium–argon dating method.
<span>Rubidium–strontium dating method.</span></span>
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
4. What is the instantaneous acceleration at t= 10 s?
vodka [1.7K]

Answer:

I am fairly certain the answer is 2m/s^2

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What distinguishes mass from weight? A. Mass is a measure of the amount of matter in an object, while weight is a measure of the
    6·2 answers
  • how do the retinas of the eyes of night hunting animals differ from the retinas of animals that hunt during the day time
    15·2 answers
  • It is 6.00 km from your home to the physics lab. as part of your physical fitness program, you could run that distance at 10.0 k
    11·1 answer
  • The mass number of an atom is equal to ______.
    10·2 answers
  • Find the acceleration of a car that can go from rest to 50 km/h in 13 s
    12·1 answer
  • Throwing a football is what type of energy
    6·2 answers
  • In acceleration time graph curve upward shows _______ acceleration
    9·2 answers
  • Three small spheres, having masses m1 = 1 kg, m2 = 3 kg, and m3 = 4 kg, are held fixed on the x axis in deep space where the eff
    13·2 answers
  • ELE Review questions
    12·1 answer
  • URGENT PLEASE ANSWER THIS ASAP I WILL MARK YOU THE BRAINLIEST !!!
    14·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!