Answer:
A 46.1+(-97.2)
Step-by-step explanation:
Its the same as going 46.1 - 97.2 because your adding a negitive to a positive you canceling out the addition with the negitive so your now subtracting
I dont see a question that i can anwser i need more information
To prove that jill is wrong we just need an example of this;
2*3*5*7*11*13 = 30030 (this is the smallest number with 6 different prime numbers)
5953*5981*5987 = 2.13x10^11 (which is obviously a much bigger number)
this is enough to prove that jill is wrong
Hello from MrBillDoesMath!
Answer:
See below
Discussion:
Triangles BAD and BCD are congruent by the SAS postulate.
* Side AD = DC because BD is the perpendicular bisector of AC.
* Angle ADB and CDB are both right angles, and hence equal, because
BD is the perpendicular bisector of AC)
Corresponding parts of congruent triangles are equal so angle BAD = angle BCD, which was to be proven.
Regards,
MrB
Treat this like a slope formula. Y2-y1 divided by x2-x1.
Your y2 value is the second population
Y1= value of first population.
X2= second year they give
X1= first year they give.
4700-3650
_________
2014-2012
1050
____
2
525 is the increase a year
